CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Recommender Systems and TechniquesSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSemantic Web and Ontologies

Representing emotions with knowledge graphs for movie recommendations

Breitfuss, Arno, Errou, Karen, Kurteva, Anelia, Fensel, Anna·2021·Future Generation Computer Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.future.2021.06.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2021.06.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breitfuss, A., Errou, K., Kurteva, A., & Fensel, A.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Kurteva, Anelia
ORCID
Kurteva, Anelia
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
125
Pages
715-725
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.future.2021.06.001
OpenAlex
W3166123258
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Interreg (AB292)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
movie recommendation, knowledge graphs, emotions, sentiment analysis, movie reviews, chatbots, user emotions, knowledge graph reasoning, media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review