Cited by 26Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesConnective tissue disorders researchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Kinematics and kinetics of people who are hypermobile. A systematic review

Bates, Alexander V., Alexander, Caroline M.·2015·Gait & Posture

Abstract

There are many studies investigating movement in individuals with hypermobile joints such that it is timely to systematically review the literature. This review concerns studies of lower limb tasks that compared kinematics and kinetics of hypermobile people with healthy controls. Its aims were to determine the quality of research completed so far and to collate what information is available regarding these factors in order to identify gaps in knowledge and provide direction for future research. A systematic search of AMED, CINAHL, Embase and MEDLINE databases alongside hand searching identified six articles fulfilling the selection criteria. Quality was evaluated using a modified Downs & Black [1] 'Quality Index' checklist and data extraction undertaken. All six articles investigated gait. Two rated as low quality and four as moderate quality. One study was omitted from data extraction to avoid a possible duplication of results. Of the remaining studies, three investigated Generalised Joint Hypermobility and two investigated Joint Hypermobility Syndrome. Sixty seven different outcome measures were used across the studies to quantify differences in gait, and these are summarised. For some of the common factors studied, conflicting findings were reported. There is no convincing evidence that hypermobile gait differs from normal in a consistent manner, and in addition, confounding factors such as pain have not been addressed. Data-dredging may have been an issue in the reviewed articles, and future research would benefit by linking outcome measures to clinically relevant factors. There is a lack of research into any task other than gait.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with HSDs appear to lack proprioceptive acuity, which may increase risk of injury due to difficulty judging joint position.

    “Patients with HSDs appear to lack proprioceptive acuity, which may increase risk of injury due to difficulty judging joint position.[26]”

    From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 26

Authors
Bates, A. V., & Alexander, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Bates, Alexander V.
Venue
Gait & Posture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
361-369
ISSN
0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167953940
Cited by
26
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gait & Posture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Imperial College Healthcare Charity
  • National Institute of Health Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
joint hypermobility, generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome, gait, lower limb kinematics, lower limb kinetics, research quality, outcome measures
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Gait, Humans, Joint Instability, Kinetics, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review