Prediction of equilibrium distributions of isotopologues for methane, ethane and propane using density functional theory
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Calculations illustrate the equilibrium temperature dependence of isotopic clumping in gaseous molecules including CO2 and CH4.
“Calculations illustrate the equilibrium temperature dependence of isotopic clumping in gaseous molecules including CO 2 and CH 4 (e.g., Wang et al. 2004, Ma et al. 2008, Piasecki et al. 2016) (Figure 1c).”
From Frontiers of Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometry (2023) · cites this paper as Piasecki et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Piasecki, A., Sessions, A., Peterson, B., & Eiler, J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Piasecki, Alison
- Venue
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 190
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2469278067
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
- Keywords
- methane, ethane, propane, deuterium, carbon-13, clumped isotopes, isotope effects, natural organic matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review