The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supercoiling in DNA and chromatin
Open accessAbstract
Supercoiling is a fundamental property of DNA and chromatin. It is modulated by polymerase and topoisomerase activities and, through regulated constraint, by DNA/chromatin binding proteins. As a non-covalent and elusive topological modification, supercoiling has proved intractable to research despite being a crucial regulator of nuclear structure and function. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the formation, regulation and organisation of supercoiling domains in vivo, and reinforce the prospect that the propagation of supercoiling can influence local and global chromatin structure. However, to further our understanding the development of new experimental tools and models are required to better dissect the mechanics of this key topological regulator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, at least as they are usually implemented, MPRAs remain limited by several factors, including the length constraints and cost of DNA synthesis or the immense complexity of shotgun libraries, the confounding effect of the reporter’s minimal promoter, and the use of episomes whose chromatin may have different properties than that of the genome189.”
From Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers (2020) · cites this paper as [189]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · cited 3×
“The boundaries of TADS are enriched for CTCF binding sites.”
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895 · cited 2×
“The boundaries of TADS are enriched for CTCF binding sites.”
Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription.
Liu, L. F., & Wang, J. C. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024 · Cited by 1,877 · cited 1×
“The classic example is the ‘twin supercoiled domain’ model where elongating RNA polymerase, in unwinding the DNA, generates positive supercoiling ahead and, in rewinding the DNA, generates negative supercoiling in its wake [7,8] (Figure 1).”
Topological domain structure of the Escherichia coli chromosome.Preprint
Postow, L., Hardy, C. D., Arsuaga, J., & Cozzarelli, N. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1207504 · Cited by 473 · cited 1×
“The genome is also separately organised into about 500 independent 10 kb supercoiling domains with demarcating barriers stochastically distributed and dynamically maintained [19,20].”
Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism
King, I. F. G., Yandava, C., Mabb, A. M., Hsiao, J. S., Huang, H., Pearson, B. L., Calabrese, J. M., Starmer, J., Parker, J. S., Magnuson, T., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12504 · Cited by 430 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
Transcription forms and remodels supercoiling domains unfolding large-scale chromatin structures
Naughton, C., Avlonitis, N., Corless, S., Prendergast, J. G. D., Mati, I. K., Eijk, P. P., Cockroft, S. L., Bradley, M., Ylstra, B., & Gilbert, N. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2509 · Cited by 376
Self-citationHistone acetylation reduces nucleosome core particle linking number change.
Norton, V. G., Imai, B., Yau, P. M., & Bradbury, E. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90920-3 · Cited by 371 · cited 1×
“Although in vitro studies support this concept [5] its operation in vivo is elusive [6].”
Kimura, K., Rybenkov, V., Crisona, N. J., Hirano, T., & Cozzarelli, N. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81018-1 · Cited by 336 · cited 1×
“Condensins introduce global positive writhe into the DNA/chromatin in vitro [46] and as a result changes in supercoiling energy are thought to co-dependently drive mitotic chromosome architecture [47] and resolution in vivo.”
Transcription-dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force
Kouzine, F., Gupta, A., Baranello, L., Wójtowicz, D., Ben-Aissa, K., Liu, J., Przytycka, T. M., & Levens, D. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2517 · Cited by 329 · cited 2×
“To understand the nature of eukaryotic supercoiling domains, psoralen binding has been used in combination with microarrays to map the distribution of DNA supercoils across entire genomes [23] or to particular chromosomal regions [24 ,25 ].”
Ma, J., Bai, L., & Wang, M. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235441 · Cited by 324 · cited 1×
“[34 ], in a single-molecule approach, used an angular optical trap.”
The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo
Kouzine, F., Sanford, S., Elisha-Feil, Z., & Levens, D. (2008) · Nature Structural &Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1372 · Cited by 303 · cited 3×
“[33] used a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase to excise a chromatin segment with its torsional stress trapped intact.”
Transcription-dependent DNA supercoiling in yeast DNA topoisomerase mutants.
Brill, S., & Sternglanz, R. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90203-6 · Cited by 227 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
Supercoiling of intracellular DNA can occur in eukaryotic cells.
Giaever, G., & Wang, J. C. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90140-7 · Cited by 223 · cited 1×
“The classic example is the ‘twin supercoiled domain’ model where elongating RNA polymerase, in unwinding the DNA, generates positive supercoiling ahead and, in rewinding the DNA, generates negative supercoiling in its wake [7,8] (Figure 1).”
Expression of transfected DNA depends on DNA topology.
Weintraub, H., Cheng, P.-F., & Conrad, K. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90865-2 · Cited by 209 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
Positive Supercoiling of Mitotic DNA Drives Decatenation by Topoisomerase II in Eukaryotes
Baxter, J., Sen, N., Martinez, V., Carandini, M. E. M. D., Schvartzman, J., Diffley, J., & Aragón, L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201538 · Cited by 196 · cited 1×
“On approaching mitosis the remaining catenations, or sister chromatid intertwinings are ‘identified’ by a process that involves an architectural change in chromatin structure, orchestrated by condensin-generated and mitotic spindle-dependant positive supercoiling [44].”
Whitford, D., & Wiley, J. (1910) · Nature · doi:10.1038/084538a0 · Cited by 194
Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling.
Mizuuchi, K., Mizuuchi, M., & Gellert, M. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4 · Cited by 190 · cited 1×
“The capacity of negative supercoiling to unwind DNA and facilitate processes such as transcription [29,30] and replication and its ability to induce alternative DNA structures such as cruciform [31], G-quadruplexes and Z-DNA [32] have been noted.”
The relative ratio of condensin I to II determines chromosome shapes.Preprint
Shintomi, K., & Hirano, T. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2060311 · Cited by 186 · cited 1×
“Condensins introduce global positive writhe into the DNA/chromatin in vitro [46] and as a result changes in supercoiling energy are thought to co-dependently drive mitotic chromosome architecture [47] and resolution in vivo.”
Structural plasticity of single chromatin fibers revealed by torsional manipulation
Bancaud, A., Silva, N. C. E., Barbi, M., Wagner, G., Allemand, J., Mozziconacci, J., Lavelle, C., Croquette, V., Victor, J., Prunell, A., et al. (2006) · Nature Structural &Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb1087 · Cited by 177
Weisbrod, S. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297289a0 · Cited by 164 · cited 1×
“Although we raised this issue, twenty-five years ago [38], the question essentially remains unanswered as the difficulty is multifaceted.”
The FUSE/FBP/FIR/TFIIH system is a molecular machine programming a pulse of c‐myc expression
Liu, J.-H., Kouzine, F., Nie, Z., Chung, H.-J., Elisha-Feil, Z., Weber, A., Zhao, K.-J., & Levens, D. (2006) · EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601101 · Cited by 158 · cited 2×
“A build up of negative supercoiling propagates along the fibre, melting the FUSE element promoting the binding of the ssDNA binding proteins, FBP and FIR [33,48].”
Travers, A., & Muskhelishvili, G. (2005) · Current Opinion in Genetics and Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2005.08.006 · Cited by 147 · cited 2×
“[3] with the Ter domain being subdivided into smaller, 35 kb domains via MatS/MatP interactions [18].”
A nucleosome core is transferred out of the path of a transcribing polymerase.
Clark, D., & Felsenfeld, G. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90262-b · Cited by 135 · cited 1×
“At the level of the ‘twin supercoil domain’ the scenario seems simplistic; positive supercoiling ahead of the polymerase will destabilize nucleosome structure and negative supercoiling behind will promote reassembly [36], actions that seem entirely consistent with the thermodynamic demands of transcription through a c…”
Lee, M., Kim, S. H., & Hong, S.-C. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911528107 · Cited by 122 · cited 1×
“The capacity of negative supercoiling to unwind DNA and facilitate processes such as transcription [29,30] and replication and its ability to induce alternative DNA structures such as cruciform [31], G-quadruplexes and Z-DNA [32] have been noted.”
DNA topoisomerase IIα is required for RNA polymerase II transcription on chromatin templates
Mondal, N., & Parvin, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35096590 · Cited by 121 · cited 1×
“Therefore, there must be a regulated balance in the localised levels of supercoiling through the concerted actions of polymerases [15] and topoisomerases [16,17].”
Transport of torsional stress in DNA.
Nelson, P. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14342 · Cited by 121 · cited 2×
“Chromatin–chromatin interactions may act as supercoil diffusion barriers but the inherent drag, and therefore reduced rotation, caused by higher levels of chromatin organisation could in itself be sufficient to form the basis of supercoiling domains [26,27].”
Chromosome length influences replication-induced topological stress
Kegel, A., Lindroos, H. B., Kanno, T., Jeppsson, K. E., Ström, L., Katou, Y., Itoh, T., Shirahige, K., & Sjögren, C. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09791 · Cited by 120 · cited 1×
“[42] observed that inhibition of topoisomerase I and the build up of positive supercoiling caused replication delay in long but not short yeast chromosomes.”
Schultz, M. C., Brill, S., Ju, Q., Sternglanz, R., & Reeder, R. H. (1992) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.6.7.1332 · Cited by 116 · cited 1×
“The capacity of negative supercoiling to unwind DNA and facilitate processes such as transcription [29,30] and replication and its ability to induce alternative DNA structures such as cruciform [31], G-quadruplexes and Z-DNA [32] have been noted.”
Rovinskiy, N., Agbleke, A. A., Chesnokova, O., Pang, Z., & Higgins, N. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002845 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“Therefore, there must be a regulated balance in the localised levels of supercoiling through the concerted actions of polymerases [15] and topoisomerases [16,17].”
Local domains of supercoiling activate a eukaryotic promoter in vivo
Dunaway, M., & Ostrander, E. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361746a0 · Cited by 108 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
Dupaigne, P., Tonthat, N., Espéli, O., Whitfill, T., Boccard, F., & Schumacher, M. (2012) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.009 · Cited by 107 · cited 1×
“[3] with the Ter domain being subdivided into smaller, 35 kb domains via MatS/MatP interactions [18].”
Condensin II initiates sister chromatid resolution during S phase
Ono, T., Yamashita, D., & Hirano, T. (2013) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201208008 · Cited by 96 · cited 1×
“Concomitantly, chromosome compaction starts during S-phase when condensin II is recruited to replicated regions [45].”
Localized torsional tension in the DNA of human cells.
Ljungman, M., & Hanawalt, P. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.13.6055 · Cited by 96 · cited 1×
“If these are not efficiently removed the residual energy may influence DNA or chromatin structure locally [28], or, if the energy can be propagated along the fibre, at more distant sites.”
French, S., Sikes, M., Hontz, R., Osheim, Y., Lambert, T. E., Hage, A. E., Smith, M. M., Tollervey, D., Smith, J. S., & Beyer, A. (2010) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00589-10 · Cited by 94 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
A method for genome-wide analysis of DNA helical tension by means of psoralen–DNA photobinding
Bermúdez, I., García-Martínez, J., Pérez-Ortín, J., & Roca, J. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq687 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“To understand the nature of eukaryotic supercoiling domains, psoralen binding has been used in combination with microarrays to map the distribution of DNA supercoils across entire genomes [23] or to particular chromosomal regions [24 ,25 ].”
Transcription-induced barriers to supercoil diffusion in the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome.
Deng, S., Stein, R., & Higgins, N. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307550101 · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“The genome is also separately organised into about 500 independent 10 kb supercoiling domains with demarcating barriers stochastically distributed and dynamically maintained [19,20].”
Topoisomerase II is required for the production of long Pol II gene transcripts in yeast
Joshi, R. S., Piña, B., & Roca, J. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks626 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“Genes that are negatively supercoiled are generally more efficiently transcribed [9,10] but topoisomerase inhibition studies [11,12 ,13,14] indicate that the accumulation of excessive positive or negative supercoiling will repress transcription.”
Architectural organization in E. coli nucleoid
Macvanin, M., & Adhya, S. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.012 · Cited by 81
Mizutani, M., Ohta, T., Watanabe, H., Handa, H., & Hirose, S. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.3.718 · Cited by 64 · cited 1×
“The capacity of negative supercoiling to unwind DNA and facilitate processes such as transcription [29,30] and replication and its ability to induce alternative DNA structures such as cruciform [31], G-quadruplexes and Z-DNA [32] have been noted.”
Yeast nucleosomes allow thermal untwisting of DNA.
Morse, R. H., Pederson, D. S., Dean, A., & Simpson, R. T. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.24.10311 · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“Nucleosomes containing yeast histones are more sensitive to thermally induced torsional stress [39] than nucleosomes containing higher eukaryotic core histones suggesting, perhaps, a greater propensity for yeast chromatin to absorb rather than transmit negative supercoiling.”
Parsa, J.-Y., Ramachandran, S., Zaheen, A., Nepal, R., Kapelnikov, A., Belcheva, A., Berrú, M., Ronai, D., & Martin, A. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002518 · Cited by 58 · cited 2×
“(b) Negative supercoiling promotes ssDNA patch formation allowing the mutagenic activity of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) [35 ].”
Effects of histone acetylation on chromatin topology in vivo
Lutter, L. C., Judis, L., & Paretti, R. F. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.11.5004-5014.1992 · Cited by 58 · cited 1×
“Although in vitro studies support this concept [5] its operation in vivo is elusive [6].”
Positional dependence of transcriptional inhibition by DNA torsional stress in yeast chromosomes
Joshi, R. S., Piña, B., & Roca, J. (2010) · EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.391 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“Although there is no direct evidence for the transmission of torsion through chromatin the phenomenon is used to explain the apparent dissipation of positive supercoiling near theendsofyeastchromosomes[41].”
García-Rubio, M., & Aguilera, A. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr840 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“Therefore, there must be a regulated balance in the localised levels of supercoiling through the concerted actions of polymerases [15] and topoisomerases [16,17].”
Transcription elongation through a chromatin template.
Lavelle, C. (2007) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2006.09.019 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“However, the many models that purport to explain the mechanics of how polymerase does in fact transcribe through a nucleosome reflects our ignorance of the details [37].”
Stupina, V., & Wang, J. C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402849101 · Cited by 25 · cited 1×
“Chromatin–chromatin interactions may act as supercoil diffusion barriers but the inherent drag, and therefore reduced rotation, caused by higher levels of chromatin organisation could in itself be sufficient to form the basis of supercoiling domains [26,27].”
Physical linkages between sister chromatids and their removal during yeast chromosome segregation.Preprint
Baxter, J., & Aragón, L. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.015 · Cited by 4 · cited 1×
“However, when converging forks approach, relaxation of positive supercoiling is restricted and the build up of torsional stress causes swivelling of the replication complex required to complete replication [43 ].”
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Freeman, 1992, DNA supercoiling in chromatin structure and gene expression, Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr, 2, 165
- Macvanin, 2012, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, BBA - Gene Regul Mech, 1819, 830
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers
Gasperini, M., Tome, J. M., & Shendure, J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0209-0 · Cited by 396
Brackley, C. A., Johnson, J., Kelly, S. L., Cook, P. R., & Marenduzzo, D. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw135 · Cited by 185
“If loops are preformed into left-handed (or right-handed) inter-wound supercoils (53), pyramids are more sharply defined (Figure 3E; these results are also consistent with those obtained in (21,33)).”
ResultChokboribal, J., Tachaboonyakiat, W., Sangvanich, P., Ruangpornvisuti, V. W., Jettanacheawchankit, S., & Thunyakitpisal, P. (2015) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.039 · Cited by 159
Enhancement of target specificity of CRISPR–Cas12a by using a chimeric DNA–RNA guide
Kim, H., Lee, W.-J., Oh, Y., Kang, S.-H., Hur, J. K., Lee, H., Song, W., Lim, K. S., Park, Y., Song, B., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa605 · Cited by 151
“Together, these results suggested that the difference in cleavage activity between PCR amplicons and endogenous intracellular loci might be related to various effects of the intracellular condition, such as degradation issues by DNA exonuclease (29), structural hindrances by binding of histones or other proteins (30),…”
BackgroundCapranico, G., Marinello, J., & Chillemi, G. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00966 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, N., & Allan, J.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gilbert, Nick
- Allan, James
- ORCID
- Gilbert, Nick
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 15-21
- ISSN
- 0959-437X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4042020
- OpenAlex
- W2166306420
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Genetics & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Medical Research Council (MR/J00913X/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- DNA supercoiling, chromatin topology, topoisomerases, DNA polymerase, DNA-binding proteins, chromatin structure, DNA topology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromatin, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review