The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CRISPR clear? Dimeric Cas9-Fok1 nucleases improve genome-editing specificity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing system provides us an unprecedented opportunity to target and modify genomic sequences with high levels of efficacy and specificity [151,152,153,154,155].”
From Cell Immortality: In Vitro Effective Techniques to Achieve and Investigate Its Applications and Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [155]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hsu, 2014, Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering, Cell, 157, 1262, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuscu, 2014, Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease, Nat Biotechnol, 32, 677, 10.1038/nbt.2916 · DOI · Paper page
- Cho, 2014, Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases, Genome Res, 24, 132, 10.1101/gr.162339.113 · DOI · Paper page
- Guilinger, 2014, Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification, Nat Biotechnol, 32, 577, 10.1038/nbt.2909 · DOI · Paper page
- Tsai, 2014, Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing, Nat Biotechnol, 32, 569, 10.1038/nbt.2908 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Chalak, M., Hesaraki, M., Mirbahari, S. N., Yeganeh, M., Abdi, S., Rajabi, S., & Hemmatzadeh, F. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14030417 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Yan, Z., Li, M., Peabody, M., & He, T.-C.
- Venue
- Genes & Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-7
- ISSN
- 2352-3042
- PMC
- PMC4217641
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AT004418, CA106569)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
