Cited by 16Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Machine learning-based identification and validation of immune-related biomarkers for early diagnosis and targeted therapy in diabetic retinopathy

Tao, Yulin, Xiong, Minqi, Peng, Yirui, Yao, Lili, Zhu, Haibo, Zhou, Qiong, Ouyang, Jun·2025·Gene

Abstract

The early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is challenging, highlighting the urgent need to identify new biomarkers. Immune responses play a crucial role in DR, yet there are currently no reports of machine learning (ML) algorithms being utilized for the development of immune-related molecular markers in DR. Based on the datasets GSE102485 and GSE160306, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Five ML algorithms including Bayesian, Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ), Wrapper (Boruta), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression were employed to select immune-related genes associated with DR (DR.Sig). Seven ML algorithms including Naive Bayes (NB), RF, Support Vector Machine (SVM), AdaBoost Classification Trees (AdaBoost), Boosted Logistic Regressions (LogitBoost), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Cancerclass were utilized to construct a predictive model for DR. The relationship between DR.Sig genes and immune cells was analyzed using single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). Additionally, drug sensitivity prediction of DR.Sig genes and molecular docking were performed. Through the utilization of 5 ML algorithms, 6 immune-related biomarkers closely related to the occurrence of DR were identified, including FCGR2B, CSRP1, EDNRA, SDC2, TEK, and CIITA. The DR predictive model constructed based on these 6 DR.Sig genes using the Cancerclass algorithm demonstrated superior predictive performance co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gene.2024.149015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 16

Authors
Tao, Y., Xiong, M., Peng, Y., Yao, L., Zhu, H., Zhou, Q., & Ouyang, J.
Affiliations
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Jiujiang First People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Qiong
  • Ouyang, Jun
Venue
Gene
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
934
Pages
149015
ISSN
0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403528246
Cited by
16
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, immune-related biomarkers, early diagnosis, differentially expressed genes, immune cell infiltration, drug response prediction, targeted therapy, Fc gamma receptor IIb, ETA receptor, syndecan-2, traditional ecological knowledge, CIITA, etoposide, FR139317, camptothecin, molecular docking, gene expression signatures
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Diabetic Retinopathy, Humans, Biomarkers, Gene Expression Profiling, Early Diagnosis, Gene Regulatory Networks, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Support Vector Machine, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review