Psychiatric morbidity following miscarriage in Hong Kong
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to examine the pattern of psychiatric morbidity up to 3 months following miscarriage and to identify the risk factors of post-miscarriage depressive disorder among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Method This is a longitudinal cohort study. Women were interviewed immediately after miscarriage to collect psychiatric and sociodemographic data. Three months later, 161 subjects (89%) were assessed by a 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID) as screening and diagnostic instruments, respectively. Results Three months after miscarriage, 10% of subjects suffered depressive disorder, 1.2% were diagnosed with anxiety disorder not otherwise specified, and another two subjects each suffered obsessive compulsive disorder (0.6%) and posttraumatic stress disorder (0.6%), respectively. Risk factors of post-miscarriage depression included younger age, history of infertility and past history of depression. Conclusions Given the local annual figure of more than 7000 first-trimester miscarriages, about 900 local women suffer post-miscarriage psychiatric disorder each year. This finding may prompt general hospitals in Hong Kong to screen for post-miscarriage psychiatric disorders, particularly depression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although no significant impact for maternal age on depression outcomes was found, an increase in anxiety levels was associated with a younger maternal age, partially supporting existing research.
“Further, although we found no significant impact for maternal age on depression outcomes, an increase in anxiety levels was associated with a younger maternal age, partially supporting existing research exploring the development of common mental health disorders following perinatal loss (Sham et al., 2010).”
From The mental health impact of perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Sham et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Sham, A. K.-H., Yiu, M. G.-C., & Ho, W. Y.-B.
- Affiliations
- United Christian Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Sham, Adrian kwan-ho
- Venue
- General Hospital Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-293
- ISSN
- 0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013018655
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- miscarriage, psychiatric morbidity, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, risk factors, Chinese women, infertility history, depression screening, Hong Kong
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Mass Screening, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review