Cited by 88Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Evaluating the promise of health IT to enhance/expand the reach of mental health services

Open access
Clarke, Greg, Yarborough, Bobbi Jo·2013·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective A growing number of health information technologies (HIT) are being developed and tested to address mental health conditions. HIT includes Internet and smartphone programs or apps, text messaging protocols and telepsychiatry. We reviewed the promise and evidence that HIT can expand access to mental health care and reduce disparities in use of services across groups in need. Conclusions Limited reach of mental health services is a pervasive problem in the United States, and solving it will require innovations that enable us to extend our clinical reach into underserved populations without significantly expanding our workforce. In theory, HIT can extend access to mental health care in several ways: by enhancing the reach to priority populations, addressing system capacity issues, supporting training, improving clinical decision making, lowering the "consumer's threshold" for treatment, delivering preventive mental health services, speeding innovation and adoption and reducing cost barriers to treatment. At present, evidence is limited, and research is needed, focusing on consumer engagement strategies, the benefits and harms of HIT for the therapeutic relationship and the comparative effectiveness of various HIT alternatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.013

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chatbots lack the ability to understand and respond to complex human emotions.

    “Chatbots lack the ability to understand and respond to complex human emotions (Clarke and Yarborough, 2013).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Clarke and Yarborough, 2013

    The paper’s “What Work is Needed?” section asks whether health-IT interventions can achieve the richness of traditional therapeutic relationships, but does not address whether chatbots can understand or respond to complex emotions. Searches for chatbots, emotional understanding, empathy, and therapeutic relationships found no passage establishing the cited claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hersh WR Wallace JA Patterson PK Shapiro SE Kraemer DF Eilers GM Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ.) 2001 1 32 PMC4781051 11569328
  2. Kehle SM Greer N Rutks I Wilt T Interventions to improve veterans’ access to care: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med 2011 26 Suppl 2 689 696 21989623 PMC3191217

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, G., & Yarborough, B. J.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
339-344
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157526982
Cited by
88
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087505)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
health information technology, access to mental health care, telepsychiatry, mobile application, text messaging intervention, online intervention, mental health prevention, underserved populations, health disparities, customer engagement, therapeutic relationship, financial barriers to treatment, workforce capacity
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Medical Informatics, Mental Health Services, Patient Compliance, Psychiatry, Rural Population, United States, Telemedicine, Internet, Computers, Handheld, Disaster Medicine, Text Messaging, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review