Cited by 82Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careMental Health Treatment and Access

Effects of depression and anxiety on quality of life in five common neurological disorders

Prisnie, Joey C., Sajobi, Tolulope T., Wang, Meng, Patten, Scott B., Fiest, Kirsten M., Bulloch, Andrew G.M., Pringsheim, Tamara, Wiebe, Samuel +1 more·2018·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether anxiety and depression impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) equally across neurological diseases. This study examines the association between anxiety or depression and HRQoL in select neurological disorders.Methods HRQoL was measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) in neurological patients: epilepsy (n = 279), migraine (n = 268), multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 222), stroke (n = 204), and Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 224). Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate variables associated with the SF-12 mental health component (MCS) and physical health component scores (PCS). Pratt index was used to estimate the relative importance of anxiety and depression on HRQoL.Results Anxiety and depression had the largest contribution to PCS in stroke and to MCS in epilepsy. Overall, anxiety and depression had a larger contribution to MCS as compared to PCS, except in stroke patients. Different patterns were seen across neurological diseases, with mental health variables strongly affecting MCS in all conditions, with also a sizable contribution to PCS in migraine, MS, and stroke.Conclusions Anxiety and depression have varying impacts on HRQoL across neurological diseases. It is important for clinicians to be aware of how these patterns differ in each condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.03.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 82

Authors
Prisnie, J. C., Sajobi, T. T., Wang, M., Patten, S. B., Fiest, K. M., Bulloch, A. G. M., Pringsheim, T., Wiebe, S., & Jette, N.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
52
Pages
58-63
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796163180
Cited by
82
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cumming School of Medicine
  • Alberta Health Services
  • Hotchkiss Brain Institute
  • Alberta Innovates Health Solutions
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, neurological disorders, epilepsy, migraine, multiple sclerosis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, psychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alberta, Anxiety, Depression, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life, Comorbidity, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review