Cited by 235Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems

Rees, R.M., Bingham, I.J., Baddeley, J.A., Watson, C.A.·2005·Geoderma

Abstract

Global climate change and concerns about soil quality have led to a widespread interest in the opportunities that are available to sequester carbon in soils. To achieve a better understanding of the changes in C storage, we need to be able to accurately measure and model inputs and losses of C from soils. This in turn requires a thorough understanding of the biological processes involved and the way in which they are influenced by the soil's physical and chemical environment. The amount of C present in a soil is determined by the difference between C addition and C loss. Because these fluxes are large relative to changes in C storage, net storage can be very difficult to measure, particularly in the short term. Carbon is added to soil from plant and animal materials deposited on the soil surface. It is known that approximately 50% of C assimilated by young plants can be transferred below ground; some is used for root construction and maintenance as well as root respiration; some organic C is lost to the soil through exudation and root turnover. A comparison of eight studies has shown that the input to the soil of root derived organic C during a growing season can range between 0.1 and 2.8 t C ha−1. Quantifying inputs from different processes has proved difficult and the relative importance of exudation and root death under field conditions remains uncertain. The chemical composition of substrates released by exudation and root death is known to be very different. Exudates con…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 206 · Cited by 235

Authors
Rees, R. M., Bingham, I. J., Baddeley, J. A., & Watson, C. A.
Affiliations
Scottish Agricultural Science Agency (GB)
Corresponding author
Rees, R.M.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
128
Issue
1-2
Pages
130-154
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048230122
Cited by
235
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoderma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, root exudation, root turnover, labile carbon, soil respiration, microbial respiration, plant respiration, net ecosystem exchange, tillage, drainage, grazing, manure application, land management, isotopic labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review