The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems
Abstract
Global climate change and concerns about soil quality have led to a widespread interest in the opportunities that are available to sequester carbon in soils. To achieve a better understanding of the changes in C storage, we need to be able to accurately measure and model inputs and losses of C from soils. This in turn requires a thorough understanding of the biological processes involved and the way in which they are influenced by the soil's physical and chemical environment. The amount of C present in a soil is determined by the difference between C addition and C loss. Because these fluxes are large relative to changes in C storage, net storage can be very difficult to measure, particularly in the short term. Carbon is added to soil from plant and animal materials deposited on the soil surface. It is known that approximately 50% of C assimilated by young plants can be transferred below ground; some is used for root construction and maintenance as well as root respiration; some organic C is lost to the soil through exudation and root turnover. A comparison of eight studies has shown that the input to the soil of root derived organic C during a growing season can range between 0.1 and 2.8 t C ha−1. Quantifying inputs from different processes has proved difficult and the relative importance of exudation and root death under field conditions remains uncertain. The chemical composition of substrates released by exudation and root death is known to be very different. Exudates con…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plant-derived C input is a major source contributing to C stocks under perennial energy crops.
“Plant- derived C input is a major source contributing to the C stocks under perennial energy crops (Rees et al.,2005).”
From Marginal land conversion to perennial energy crops with biomass removal enhances soil carbon sequestration (2022) · cites this paper as Rees et al.,2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 206 · Cited by 235
- Authors
- Rees, R. M., Bingham, I. J., Baddeley, J. A., & Watson, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Scottish Agricultural Science Agency (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rees, R.M.
- Venue
- Geoderma
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 130-154
- ISSN
- 0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048230122
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geoderma (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, root exudation, root turnover, labile carbon, soil respiration, microbial respiration, plant respiration, net ecosystem exchange, tillage, drainage, grazing, manure application, land management, isotopic labeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review