The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Near- versus mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis emphasizing carbon and laboratory versus on-site analysis: Where are we and what needs to be done?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prediction of soil organic carbon for different levels of soil moisture using Vis-NIR spectroscopy
Nocita, M., Stevens, A., Noon, C., & van Wesemael, B. (2013) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.07.020 · Cited by 334
Large errors in soil carbon measurements attributed to inconsistent sample processing
Even, R. J., Machmuller, M. B., Lavallee, J. M., Zelikova, T. J., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2025) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-11-17-2025 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Reeves, J. B.
- Venue
- Geoderma
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079586129
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Near- versus mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis emphasizing carbon and laboratory versus on-site analysis: Where are we and what needs to be done? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.04.005
- The paper
- Reeves, J. B. (2010). Near- versus mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis emphasizing carbon and laboratory versus on-site analysis: Where are we and what needs to be done? Geoderma. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.04.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
