Biochar impact on Midwestern Mollisols and maize nutrient availability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the second cropping year, biochar along with pyrogallol application increased available K content by 78% over unamended control.
“In the second cropping year, biochar along with pyrogallol application increased the available K content by 78% over the unamended control (Rogovska et al., 2014).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Rogovska et al., 2014
Two years after application of biochar prepared from mixed hardwood chips in a fine loamy Hapludols decreased the extractable P at different incubation periods.
“Two years after application of biochar prepared from mixed hardwood chips (primarily oak ( Quercus sp.), elm ( Ulmus sp.) and hickory ( Carya spp sp.)) in a fine loamy Hapludols decreased the extractable P at different incubation periods (Rogovska et al., 2014).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Rogovska et al., 2014
Two years of mixed hardwood biochar application in fine loamy Hapludols almost doubled the extractable K content over unamended soil.
“Two years of mixed hardwood biochar (primarily oak, elm and hickory) application in fine loamy Hapludols had almost doubled the extractable K content over the unamended soil (Rogovska et al., 2014).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Rogovska et al., 2014
Soil extractable Mn and Fe decreased, while Cu and Zn increased due to application of a mixed wood biochar.
“Among the micronutrients, soil extractable Mn and Fe decreased, while Cu and Zn increased due to the application of a mixed wood biochar (Rogovska et al., 2014).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Rogovska et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 208
- Authors
- Rogovska, N., Laird, D. A., Rathke, S. J., & Karlen, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rogovska, Natalia
- Venue
- Geoderma
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 230-231
- Pages
- 340-347
- ISSN
- 0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006764659
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geoderma (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- biochar, Mollisols, maize, nutrient availability, soil quality, soil pH, soil organic carbon, soil water availability, bulk density, soil carbon sequestration, allelochemicals, maize residue, drought, grain yield, temperate soils
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review