The symbolic and political appropriation of scales: a critical analysis of the Amazonian ranchers’ narrative
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internationally, public debates on zero deforestation and sustainable supply chains have thus far mostly represented local and international nature conservation organizations, governments and businesses.
“Internationally, public debates on zero deforestation and sustainable supply chains have thus far mostly represented local and international nature conservation organizations, governments and businesses (Taravella and de Sartre, 2012;Pirard et al., 2015;Newton and Benzeev, 2018).”
From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Taravella and de Sartre, 2012
The available Abstract (no page indicated) discusses Amazonian ranchers’ narratives about protected areas and the influence of those narratives on decision makers. Searches for zero deforestation, sustainable supply chains, and the representation of conservation organizations, governments, and businesses found no passage addressing who has predominated in those public debates. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil
Mammadova, A., Behagel, J., & Masiero, M. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taravella, R., & Arnauld de Sartre, X.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Taravella, Romain
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 645-656
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966022250
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- shs.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoforum (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- scale, ranchers, Eastern Amazon, protected areas, local development, localism, political appropriation, environmental governance, regional decision-making, constructivism, ontological approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
