Co-motion: Making space to care for country
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar arguments and scenarios to those for Two-Eyed Seeing co-governance have been built around the Two Row Wampum model, the Two Ways philosophy, and the Double-Canoe framework.
“similar arguments and scenarios have been built around the Two Row Wampum model (seeStevenson, 2006), the Two Ways philosophy (seeMuller, 2014), and the Double-Canoe framework (seeMaxwell et al., 2019).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Muller, 2014
Cites
The Possibility of Difference: Rethinking Co-management
Stevenson, M. G. (2006) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“…path for meaningful and equitable co-governance based on a Two-Eyed Seeing approach—similar arguments and scenarios have been built around the Two Row Wampum model (see Stevenson, 2006), the Two Ways philosophy (see Muller, 2014), and the Double-Canoe framework (see Maxwell et al., 2019).”
Method
- Authors
- Muller, S.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Muller, Samantha
- ORCID
- Muller, Samantha
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 132-141
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083365057
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geoforum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- caring for country, natural resource management, ontological difference, Yolngu, cross-cultural collaboration, institutional power, self-determination (international law), indigenous self-government, Arnhem Land
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
