Cited by 168Urban Planning and Landscape DesignUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrban Development and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The social connectivity of urban rivers

Kondolf, G. Mathias, Pinto, Pedro J.·2017·Geomorphology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Conrad, 1899, vol. 165, no. 1000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–167 of 167

Metadata

Authors
Kondolf, G. M., & Pinto, P. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Kondolf, G. Mathias
Venue
Geomorphology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
277
Pages
182-196
ISSN
0169-555X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520550016
Cited by
168
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geomorphology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
urban rivers, social connectedness, river connectivity, river width, waterfront use, river recreation, river transport, urban form, human-river relationship, vertical connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review