Can agroecology improve food security and nutrition? A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A previous review by Bezner Kerr et al. (2021) emphasizes the existence of fewer studies on certain agroecological practices such as livestock integration and management or landscape-level practices.
“A previous review by Bezner Kerr et al. (2021) also emphasizes the existence of fewer studies on certain agroecological practices such as livestock integration and management or landscape-level practices.”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Bezner Kerr et al. (2021)
In their systematic review, Kerr et al. found that adopting comprehensive agroecological approaches to food systems increases the likelihood of improved food security and nutrition.
“In their systematic review, Kerr et al. [43] found that adopting comprehensive agroecological approaches to food systems increases the likelihood of improved food security and nutrition.”
From Agroecological Transition: A Territorial Examination of the Simultaneity of Limited Farmer Livelihoods and Food Insecurity (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
There is an abundance of research on agroecology-based food systems transition and the impact on food security and nutrition in the context of strong farmer-to-farmer collaborations, but a dearth of research on fostering direct producer-to-disadvantaged consumer markets in developed economies.
“Interestingly, the authors highlight an abundance of research on agroecologybased food systems transition and the impact on food security and nutrition in the context of strong farmer-to-farmer collaborations and in developing economies, but a dearth of it for fostering direct producer-to-disadvantaged consumer markets in developed economies.”
From Agroecological Transition: A Territorial Examination of the Simultaneity of Limited Farmer Livelihoods and Food Insecurity (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 359
- Authors
- Bezner Kerr, R., Madsen, S., Stüber, M., Liebert, J., Enloe, S., Borghino, N., Parros, P., Mutyambai, D. M., Prudhon, M., & Wezel, A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Institut Supérieur d'Agriculture Rhône-Alpes (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Food Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 100540
- ISSN
- 2211-9124 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3157166735
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 76.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Food Security (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Keywords
- agroecology, food security, nutrition, agroecological practices, crop diversification, intercropping, agroforestry, crop-livestock integration, soil management, low-income countries, household food security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review