Cited by 359Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Can agroecology improve food security and nutrition? A review

Bezner Kerr, Rachel, Madsen, Sidney, Stüber, Moritz, Liebert, Jeffrey, Enloe, Stephanie, Borghino, Noélie, Parros, Phoebe, Mutyambai, Daniel Munyao +2 more·2021·Global Food Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous review by Bezner Kerr et al. (2021) emphasizes the existence of fewer studies on certain agroecological practices such as livestock integration and management or landscape-level practices.

    “A previous review by Bezner Kerr et al. (2021) also emphasizes the existence of fewer studies on certain agroecological practices such as livestock integration and management or landscape-level practices.”

    From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Bezner Kerr et al. (2021)

  • In their systematic review, Kerr et al. found that adopting comprehensive agroecological approaches to food systems increases the likelihood of improved food security and nutrition.

    “In their systematic review, Kerr et al. [43] found that adopting comprehensive agroecological approaches to food systems increases the likelihood of improved food security and nutrition.”
  • There is an abundance of research on agroecology-based food systems transition and the impact on food security and nutrition in the context of strong farmer-to-farmer collaborations, but a dearth of research on fostering direct producer-to-disadvantaged consumer markets in developed economies.

    “Interestingly, the authors highlight an abundance of research on agroecologybased food systems transition and the impact on food security and nutrition in the context of strong farmer-to-farmer collaborations and in developing economies, but a dearth of it for fostering direct producer-to-disadvantaged consumer markets in developed economies.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 359

Authors
Bezner Kerr, R., Madsen, S., Stüber, M., Liebert, J., Enloe, S., Borghino, N., Parros, P., Mutyambai, D. M., Prudhon, M., & Wezel, A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Institut Supérieur d'Agriculture Rhône-Alpes (FR)
Venue
Global Food Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
29
Pages
100540
ISSN
2211-9124 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157166735
Cited by
359
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 12
FWCI
76.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Food Security (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
agroecology, food security, nutrition, agroecological practices, crop diversification, intercropping, agroforestry, crop-livestock integration, soil management, low-income countries, household food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review