Base editors: Expanding the types of DNA damage products harnessed for genome editing
Open accessAbstract
Base editors are an innovative addition to the genome editing toolbox that introduced a new genome editing strategy to the field. Instead of using double-stranded DNA breaks, base editors use nucleobase modification chemistry to efficiently and precisely incorporate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) into the genome of living cells. Two classes of DNA base editors currently exist: deoxycytidine deamination-derived editors (CBEs, which facilitate C•G to T•A mutations) and deoxyadenosine deamination-derived base editors (ABEs, which facilitate A•T to G•C mutations). More recently, the development of mitochondrial base editors allowed the introduction of C•G to T•A mutations into mitochondrial DNA as well. Base editors show great potential as therapeutic agents and research tools, and extensive studies have been carried out to improve upon the original base editor constructs to aid researchers in a variety of disciplines. Despite their widespread use, there are few publications that focus on elucidating the biological pathways involved during the processing of base editor intermediates. Because base editors introduce unique types of DNA damage products (a U•G mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for CBEs, and an I•T mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for ABEs) to facilitate genome editing, a deep understanding of the DNA damage repair pathways that facilitate or impede base editing represents an important aspect for the further expansion and improvement of the technologies. Here, we first review canonical deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, and single-stranded break repair. Then, we discuss how interactions among these different repair processes can lead to different base editing outcomes. Through this review, we hope to promote thoughtful discussions on the DNA repair mechanisms of base editing, as well as help researchers in the improvement of the current base editors and the development of new base editors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ABE editing results in two possible outcomes: the wild-type A·T or the edited G·C.
“Aside from rare indel formation, ABE editing results in two possible outcomes: the wild-type A·T or the edited G·C.”
From Adenine base editor for knockout of proteins: A practical guide from design to analysis with updated MultiEditRbatch (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems
Nishida, K., Arazoe, T., Yachie, N., Banno, S., Kakimoto, M., Tabata, M., Mochizuki, M., Miyabe, A., Araki, M., Hara, K. Y., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8729 · Cited by 1,349 · see citing works
Richter, M. F., Zhao, K. T., Eton, E., Lapinaite, A., Newby, G. A., Thuronyi, B. W., Wilson, C., Koblan, L. W., Zeng, J., Bauer, D. E., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z · Cited by 1,020 · see citing works
Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity
Thuronyi, B. W., Koblan, L. W., Levy, J. M., Yeh, W.-H., Zheng, C., Newby, G. A., Wilson, C., Bhaumik, M., Shubina-Oleinik, O., Holt, J. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0193-0 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
FORTINI, P., & DOGLIOTTI, E. (2007) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.008 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eaton, E. J., Wick, B. J., Chacón, J. S., Wang, A. J., Kluesner, M., Barnes, J. T., Kar, B., Wang, M., Johnson, M. J., Skeate, J. G., et al. (2026) · Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102908 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gu, S., Bodai, Z., Cowan, Q. T., & Komor, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Komor, Alexis C.
- Venue
- Gene and Genome Editing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 100005
- ISSN
- 2666-3880 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8341163
- OpenAlex
- W3157172536
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gene and Genome Editing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- base editors, DNA repair, deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, single nucleotide variants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review