PT305 Acute effects of Swedish oral moist snuff (snus) on arterial stiffness in young habitual users
Abstract
Prior studies have shown that combinations of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) have synergistic effects on BRAFi-resistant melanoma through enhanced apoptosis and inhibition of the cAMP-dependent drug resistance pathway. However, little is known about the expression of various HDACs and their associations with BRAF/NRAS mutation status, clinicopathologic characteristics, and patient outcome. The present study extensively profiled HDAC class 1 and their targets/regulators utilizing immunohistochemistry in human melanoma samples from patients with stage IV melanoma, known BRAF/NRAS mutational status, and detailed clinicopatholgical data. HDAC8 was increased in BRAF-mutated melanoma (P=0.016), however, no association between expression of other HDACs and NRAS/BRAF status was identified. There was also a correlation between HDAC1, HDAC8 expression, and phosphorylated NFκb p65 immunoreactivity (P<0.001). Increased cytoplasmic HDAC8 immunoreactivity was independently associated with an improved survival from both diagnosis of primary melanoma and from first detection of stage IV disease to melanoma death on multivariate analysis (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.987–0.996; P<0.001 and HR 0.993, 95% CI 0.988–0.998; P=0.009, respectively). These results suggest not only that HDAC8 may be a prognostic biomarker in melanoma, but also provide important data regarding the regulation of HDACs in melanoma and a rational basis for targeting them therapeutically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acute exposure to snus compared to placebo significantly increases systolic blood pressure and heart rate.
“acute exposure to snus compared to placebo significantly increased SBP (+ 8.1 ± 11 mmHg vs. +1.7 ± 11 mmHg; p = 0.002) and HRT (+ 9.3 ± 13 bpm vs. +2.3± 12 bpm; p < 0.001).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Antoniewicz et al. 2014
Arterial stiffness measurements (pulse wave velocity, arterial pressure, and Aix75) remain unaffected by acute exposure to snus.
“arterial stiffness measurements (pulse wave velocity (PWV), arterial pressure (AP) and Aix75) remained unaffected by exposure to snus (Antoniewicz et al. 2014).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Antoniewicz et al. 2014
Acute exposure to snus compared to placebo slightly increases diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.075).
“there was a slight increase in DBP (+ 6.2 ± 11 mmHg vs. +2.7 ± 9 mmHg; p = 0.075) upon acute exposure to snus.”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Antoniewicz et al. 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Antoniewicz, L., Novo, M., Lundbäck, M., Mobarrez, F., Kuhl, J., & Bosson, J.
- Venue
- Global Heart
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e225
- ISSN
- 2211-8160
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review