Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video)

Open access
Saito, Yutaka, Uraoka, Toshio, Matsuda, Takahisa, Emura, Fabian, Ikehara, Hisatomo, Mashimo, Yumi, Kikuchi, Tsuyoshi, Fu, Kuang-I., Sano, Yasushi, Saito, Daizo·2007·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer; however, it is not widely used in the colorectum because of its technical difficulty. OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of using ESD for treating large superficial colorectal tumors and to evaluate the clinical outcome. DESIGN AND SETTING Case series conducted at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo. PATIENTS A total of 198 consecutive patients were treated for 200 lesions. INTERVENTIONS Procedures were performed, before July 2004, by using a monopolar needle knife or an insulation-tipped knife (IT knife). After July 2004, the procedures were performed by using a bipolar needle knife or an IT knife. After injection of glycerol and sodium hyaluronate acid into the submucosal (sm) layer, a circumferential incision was made and sm dissection was performed endoscopically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS The en bloc resection rate was 84% and the curative resection rate was 83%. RESULTS Among the 200 ESDs, 51 involved tubular adenomas, 99 intramucosal cancers, 22 minute sm cancers, and 28 sm deep cancers. The median operation time was 90 minutes, and the mean size of resected specimens was 38 mm (range, 20-150 mm). Perforations occurred in 10 cases (5%) and postoperative bleeding in 4 cases (2%), but only 1 perforation case needed emergency surgery, because endoscopic clipping was ineffective. LIMITATIONS No long-term outcome data yet. CONCLUSIONS ESD is a feasible technique for treating large superficial colorectal tumors, because it provides a higher en bloc resection rate and is less invasive than surgical resection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Metadata

Authors
Saito, Y., Uraoka, T., Matsuda, T., Emura, F., Ikehara, H., Mashimo, Y., Kikuchi, T., Fu, K.-I., Sano, Y., & Saito, D.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
966-973
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094232456
Cited by
373
References
14
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053
The paper
Saito, Y., Uraoka, T., Matsuda, T., Emura, F., Ikehara, H., Mashimo, Y., Kikuchi, T., Fu, K.-I., Sano, Y., & Saito, D. (2007). Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.