The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model
Abstract
Background and aims A purely endoluminal method of GI bypass would be desirable for the treatment of obstruction, obesity, or metabolic syndrome. We have developed a technology based on miniature self-assembling magnets that create large-caliber anastomoses (Incisionless Anastomosis System [IAS]). The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural characteristics of IAS deployment and long-term anastomotic integrity and patency. Methods We performed a 3-month survival study of Yorkshire pigs (5 interventions, 3 controls). Intervention pigs underwent simultaneous enteroscopy/colonoscopy performed with the animals under intravenous sedation. The IAS magnets were deployed and coupled with reciprocal magnets under fluoroscopy. Every 3 to 6 days pigs underwent endoscopy until jejunocolonic anastomosis (dual-path bypass) creation and magnet expulsion. Necropsies and histological evaluation were performed. The primary endpoints were technical success; secondary endpoints of anastomosis integrity, patency, and histological characteristics were weight trends. Results Under intravenous sedation, endoscopic bypass creation by using IAS magnets was successfully performed in 5 of 5 pigs (100%). Given porcine anatomy, the easiest dual-path bypass to create was between the proximal jejunum and colon. The mean procedure time was 14.7 minutes. Patent, leak-free anastomoses formed by day 4. All IAS magnets were expelled by day 12. All anastomoses were fully patent at 3 months with a mean diameter of 3.5 cm. The mean 3-month weight was 45 kg in bypass pigs and 78 kg in controls (P = .01). At necropsy, adhesions were absent. Histology showed full re-epithelialization across the anastomosis without fibrosis or inflammation. Conclusion Large-caliber, leak-free, foreign body-free endoscopic intestinal bypass by using IAS magnets can be safely and rapidly performed in the porcine by model using only intravenous sedation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Early studies, including preclinical research on porcine models, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this technique [106].”
From Impact of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Therapies on Liver Health in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Review (2025) · cites this paper as [106]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Nagy, 1995, Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy for duodenal obstruction, Am J Surg, 169, 539, 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80213-X · DOI
- Ly, 2010, A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction, Surg Endosc, 24, 290, 10.1007/s00464-009-0577-1 · DOI
- Gentileschi, 2002, Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery, Surg Endosc, 16, 736, 10.1007/s00464-001-8239-y · DOI
- Himpens, 2004, The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Semin Laparosc Surg, 11, 171
- Ryou, 2011, Smart Self-Assembling MagnetS for ENdoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 73, 353, 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.024 · DOI
- Ryou, 2008, Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colostomy closure modalities, Endoscopy, 40, 432, 10.1055/s-2007-995691 · DOI
- Kantsevoy, 2005, Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model, Gastrointest Endosc, 62, 287, 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)01565-8 · DOI
- Bergstrom, 2006, Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 63, 307, 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.035 · DOI
- Chiu, 2010, Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 71, 390, 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.019 · DOI
- Shang, 2009, First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Obes Surg, 19, 230, 10.1007/s11695-008-9661-1 · DOI
- Swain, 1991, Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy, Gastrointest Endosc, 37, 626, 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70870-5 · DOI
- Villaverde, 2004, Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract], Gastrointest Endosc, 59, AB92, 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00472-9 · DOI
- Fritscher-Ravens, 2003, Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 58, 585, 10.1067/S0016-5107(03)02006-6 · DOI
- Jamshidi, 2009, Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques, J Pediatr Surg, 44, 222, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.044 · DOI
- Pichakron, 2011, Magnamosis II: Magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy, J Am Coll Surg, 212, 42, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.031 · DOI
- Gonzales, 2012, Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, J Pediatr Surg, 47, 1291, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.042 · DOI
- Wall, 2013, Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery, Endoscopy, 45, 643, 10.1055/s-0033-1344119 · DOI
- Diana, 2011, Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendez-vous technique, Surg Innov, 18, 317, 10.1177/1553350611409761 · DOI
- Cope, 1995, Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 6, 539, 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71131-9 · DOI
- Chopita, 2005, Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets, Endoscopy, 37, 313, 10.1055/s-2005-861358 · DOI
- Cope, 2001, Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents, Gastrointest Endosc, 53, 780, 10.1067/mge.2001.114964 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tasabehji, D., Saleh, S., & Mokadem, M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14124012 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryou, M., Agoston, A. T., & Thompson, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Christopher C.
- Venue
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 821-825
- ISSN
- 0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1945109061
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Keywords
- jejunojejunostomy, anastomotic integrity, anastomotic patency, obesity, metabolic syndrome, intravenous sedation, re-epithelialization, porcine model
- MeSH terms
- Anastomosis, Surgical, Animals, Body Weight, Colon, Jejunum, Pressure, Swine, Time Factors, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Magnets, Re-Epithelialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review