Cited by 66Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesEsophageal and GI Pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model

Ryou, Marvin, Agoston, A. Tony, Thompson, Christopher C.·2016·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

Background and aims A purely endoluminal method of GI bypass would be desirable for the treatment of obstruction, obesity, or metabolic syndrome. We have developed a technology based on miniature self-assembling magnets that create large-caliber anastomoses (Incisionless Anastomosis System [IAS]). The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural characteristics of IAS deployment and long-term anastomotic integrity and patency. Methods We performed a 3-month survival study of Yorkshire pigs (5 interventions, 3 controls). Intervention pigs underwent simultaneous enteroscopy/colonoscopy performed with the animals under intravenous sedation. The IAS magnets were deployed and coupled with reciprocal magnets under fluoroscopy. Every 3 to 6 days pigs underwent endoscopy until jejunocolonic anastomosis (dual-path bypass) creation and magnet expulsion. Necropsies and histological evaluation were performed. The primary endpoints were technical success; secondary endpoints of anastomosis integrity, patency, and histological characteristics were weight trends. Results Under intravenous sedation, endoscopic bypass creation by using IAS magnets was successfully performed in 5 of 5 pigs (100%). Given porcine anatomy, the easiest dual-path bypass to create was between the proximal jejunum and colon. The mean procedure time was 14.7 minutes. Patent, leak-free anastomoses formed by day 4. All IAS magnets were expelled by day 12. All anastomoses were fully patent at 3 months with a mean diameter of 3.5 cm. The mean 3-month weight was 45 kg in bypass pigs and 78 kg in controls (P = .01). At necropsy, adhesions were absent. Histology showed full re-epithelialization across the anastomosis without fibrosis or inflammation. Conclusion Large-caliber, leak-free, foreign body-free endoscopic intestinal bypass by using IAS magnets can be safely and rapidly performed in the porcine by model using only intravenous sedation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Nagy, 1995, Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy for duodenal obstruction, Am J Surg, 169, 539, 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80213-X · DOI
  2. Ly, 2010, A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction, Surg Endosc, 24, 290, 10.1007/s00464-009-0577-1 · DOI
  3. Gentileschi, 2002, Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery, Surg Endosc, 16, 736, 10.1007/s00464-001-8239-y · DOI
  4. Himpens, 2004, The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Semin Laparosc Surg, 11, 171
  5. Ryou, 2011, Smart Self-Assembling MagnetS for ENdoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 73, 353, 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.024 · DOI
  6. Ryou, 2008, Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colostomy closure modalities, Endoscopy, 40, 432, 10.1055/s-2007-995691 · DOI
  7. Kantsevoy, 2005, Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model, Gastrointest Endosc, 62, 287, 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)01565-8 · DOI
  8. Bergstrom, 2006, Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 63, 307, 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.035 · DOI
  9. Chiu, 2010, Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video), Gastrointest Endosc, 71, 390, 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.019 · DOI
  10. Shang, 2009, First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Obes Surg, 19, 230, 10.1007/s11695-008-9661-1 · DOI
  11. Swain, 1991, Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy, Gastrointest Endosc, 37, 626, 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70870-5 · DOI
  12. Villaverde, 2004, Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract], Gastrointest Endosc, 59, AB92, 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00472-9 · DOI
  13. Fritscher-Ravens, 2003, Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 58, 585, 10.1067/S0016-5107(03)02006-6 · DOI
  14. Jamshidi, 2009, Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques, J Pediatr Surg, 44, 222, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.044 · DOI
  15. Pichakron, 2011, Magnamosis II: Magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy, J Am Coll Surg, 212, 42, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.031 · DOI
  16. Gonzales, 2012, Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, J Pediatr Surg, 47, 1291, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.042 · DOI
  17. Wall, 2013, Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery, Endoscopy, 45, 643, 10.1055/s-0033-1344119 · DOI
  18. Diana, 2011, Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendez-vous technique, Surg Innov, 18, 317, 10.1177/1553350611409761 · DOI
  19. Cope, 1995, Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 6, 539, 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71131-9 · DOI
  20. Chopita, 2005, Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets, Endoscopy, 37, 313, 10.1055/s-2005-861358 · DOI
  21. Cope, 2001, Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents, Gastrointest Endosc, 53, 780, 10.1067/mge.2001.114964 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ryou, M., Agoston, A. T., & Thompson, C. C.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Christopher C.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
821-825
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1945109061
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
Keywords
jejunojejunostomy, anastomotic integrity, anastomotic patency, obesity, metabolic syndrome, intravenous sedation, re-epithelialization, porcine model
MeSH terms
Anastomosis, Surgical, Animals, Body Weight, Colon, Jejunum, Pressure, Swine, Time Factors, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Magnets, Re-Epithelialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review