Cited by 155Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video)

Open access
Mori, Yuichi, Kudo, Shin-ei, East, James E., Rastogi, Amit, Bretthauer, Michael, Misawa, Masashi, Sekiguchi, Masau, Matsuda, Takahisa +6 more·2020·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

Background and aims Artificial intelligence (AI) is being implemented in colonoscopy practice, but no study has investigated whether AI is cost saving. We aimed to quantify the cost reduction using AI as an aid in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Methods This study is an add-on analysis of a clinical trial that investigated the performance of AI for differentiating colorectal polyps (ie, neoplastic versus non-neoplastic). We included all patients with diminutive (≤5 mm) rectosigmoid polyps in the analyses. The average colonoscopy cost was compared for 2 scenarios: (1) a diagnose-and-leave strategy supported by the AI prediction (ie, diminutive rectosigmoid polyps were not removed when predicted as non-neoplastic), and (2) a resect-all-polyps strategy. Gross annual costs for colonoscopies were also calculated based on the number and reimbursement of colonoscopies conducted under public health insurances in 4 countries. Results Overall, 207 patients with 250 diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (104 neoplastic, 144 non-neoplastic, and 2 indeterminate) were included. AI correctly differentiated neoplastic polyps with 93.3% sensitivity, 95.2% specificity, and 95.2% negative predictive value. Thus, 105 polyps were removed and 145 were left under the diagnose-and-leave strategy, which was estimated to reduce the average colonoscopy cost and the gross annual reimbursement for colonoscopies by 18.9% and US$149.2 million in Japan, 6.9% and US$12.3 million in England, 7.6% and US$1.1 million in Norway, and 10.9% and US$85.2 million in the United States, respectively, compared with the resect-all-polyps strategy. Conclusions The use of AI to enable the diagnose-and-leave strategy results in substantial cost reductions for colonoscopy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3759

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mori et al. emphasized that maintaining AI implementation costs at approximately $19 per colonoscopy procedure is crucial for achieving cost-savings.

    “Mori et al.20 emphasized that maintaining AI implementation costs at approximately $19 per colonoscopy procedure is crucial for achieving cost-savings.”
  • Studies in AF screening, colonoscopy, and medication management consistently reported low ICERs and substantial per-patient cost reductions relative to conventional care.

    “studies in AF screening26, colonoscopy20, and medication management27 consistently reported low ICERs and substantial per-patient cost reductions relative to conventional care.”
  • Mori et al. reported annual national savings of $149.2 million in Japan and $85.2 million in the United States from an AI-assisted colonoscopy strategy.

    “Mori et al.20 reported annual national savings of $149.2 million in Japan and $85.2 million in the United States from an AI-assisted colonoscopy strategy”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 155

Authors
Mori, Y., Kudo, S.-E., East, J. E., Rastogi, A., Bretthauer, M., Misawa, M., Sekiguchi, M., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., Ikematsu, H., Hotta, K., Ohtsuka, K., Kudo, T., & Mori, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • SHOWA Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital (JP)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • National Cancer Centre Japan (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP)
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Mori, Yuichi
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
905-911.e1
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013146603
Cited by
155
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, colonoscopy, colorectal polyps, cost reduction, polypectomy, reimbursement, public health insurance, Japan, England, Norway, United States
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, England, Humans, Japan, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cost Savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review