The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guns, germs, and steel…and artificial intelligence
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The adenoma detection algorithm appears to be easier for cross-compatibility because of the distinct difference in appearance between adenoma (or polyp) and normal mucosa [56].”
From Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies.
Hardin, G., & Diamond, J. M. (1997) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137390 · Cited by 4,983
Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies
Leidy, L. (1999) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1999)11:4 · Cited by 582
de Groof, A. J., Struyvenberg, M. R., van der Putten, J. A., van der Sommen, F., Fockens, K. N., Curvers, W. L., Zinger, S., Pouw, R. E., Coron, E., Baldaque‐Silva, F., et al. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.030 · Cited by 346
Hashimoto, R., Requa, J., Dao, T., Ninh, A. Q., Tran, E., Mai, D., Lugo, M., Chehade, N. E.-H., Chang, K. J., Karnes, W. E., et al. (2020) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.049 · Cited by 237
Self-citationStruyvenberg, M. R., de Groof, A. J., van der Putten, J. A., van der Sommen, F., Baldaque‐Silva, F., Omae, M., Pouw, R. E., Bisschops, R., Vieth, M. W., Schoon, E. J., et al. (2020) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.050 · Cited by 89
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review
Lam, T. Y. T., Cheung, M. F. K., Munro, Y. L., Lim, K. M., Shung, D., & Sung, J. J. Y. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/37188 · Cited by 120
“We should also test how machine intelligence and”
Metadata
- Authors
- Samarasena, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Samarasena, Jason B.
- ORCID
- Samarasena, Jason B.
- Venue
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-101
- ISSN
- 0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111122565
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, history of technology, societal impact of technology, future of medicine
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Barrett Esophagus, Computers, Firearms, Humans, Steel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
