Cited by 35Diabetes Treatment and ManagementGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on endoscopy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Singh, Sahib, Rahman, Syed Hamaad, Khan, Nihal, Rajagopal, Anjali, Shafique, Nouman, Tawde, Poonam, Bhardwaj, Vaishali, Suresh Kumar, Vishnu Charan +5 more·2025·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

Background and aims Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are known to cause delayed gastric emptying; however, the effect on clinical outcomes during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the data. Methods Online databases were searched for studies evaluating GLP-1RAs versus a control group (no GLP-1RAs) in patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were rate of retained gastric contents (RGCs), aborted procedures, aspiration events, and subjective bowel preparation quality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. Results Twenty-three studies with 77,152 patients (4449 in the GLP-1RA arm and 72,703 in the control arm) were included. Mean patient age ranged from 47.6 to 72 years, and 58.4% were women. As compared with the control group, the GLP-1RA group had higher odds of RGCs (OR, 15.39; 95% CI, 4.65-50.99; P < .01) and aborted procedures (OR, 13.86; 95% CI, 4.42-43.43; P < .01). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of aspiration events (OR, 21.06; 95% CI, .13-3379.01; P = .24) and subjective bowel preparation quality (OR, .94; 95% CI, .67-1.31; P = .83). Conclusions Although statistical significance was reached in terms of visible RGCs and early termination of endoscopies in patients on GLP-1RAs, these events were overall rare. GLP-1RAs do not appear to pose significant risk, as the odds of developing aspiration were comparable in the 2 groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous systematic reviews have examined the risk of pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric contents among patients using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, but they have been limited to patients undergoing endoscopic procedures or those temporarily exposed to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists during the immediate peri-operative period.

    “Previous systematic reviews have examined the risk of pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric contents among patients using GLP‐1 RAs, but they have been limited to patients undergoing endoscopic procedures [27, 28, 29] or those temporarily exposed to GLP‐1 RAs during the immediate peri‐operative period [30].”
  • None of these reviews identified an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia.

    “Importantly, none of these reviews identified an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia.”
  • Three systematic reviews reported increased risk for premature termination of endoscopy among GLP-1RA users: Baig et al. OR 4.5, Facciorusso et al. OR 5.6, and Singh et al. OR 13.9.

    “Baig et al. (35) and Facciorusso et al. (36) reported an increased risk (odds ratios 4.5 and 5.6, respectively) for premature termination among individuals taking GLP-1RAs, while Singh et al. reported an even greater risk (odds ratio 13.9) (37).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 35

Authors
Singh, S., Rahman, S. H., Khan, N., Rajagopal, A., Shafique, N., Tawde, P., Bhardwaj, V., Suresh Kumar, V. C., Aswath, G., Inamdar, S., Dutta, S., Hurairah, A., & Mohan, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Sinai Hospital (US)
  • Methodist Dallas Medical Center (US)
  • AdventHealth Orlando (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Avalon University School of Medicine (CW)
  • Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital (IN)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • Orlando Health (US)
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
343-349.e5
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403344093
Cited by
35
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy, aspiration, bowel preparation quality, delayed gastric emptying, endoscopy safety
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Colonoscopy, Gastric Emptying, Gastrointestinal Contents, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review