De novo ZMYND8 variants result in an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder with cardiac malformations
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: ZMYND8 encodes a multidomain protein that serves as a central interactive hub for coordinating critical roles in transcription regulation, chromatin remodeling, regulation of super-enhancers, DNA damage response and tumor suppression. We delineate a novel neurocognitive disorder caused by variants in the ZMYND8 gene. METHODS: An international collaboration, exome sequencing, molecular modeling, yeast two-hybrid assays, analysis of available transcriptomic data and a knockdown Drosophila model were used to characterize the ZMYND8 variants. RESULTS: ZMYND8 variants were identified in 11 unrelated individuals; 10 occurred de novo and one suspected de novo; 2 were truncating, 9 were missense, of which one was recurrent. The disorder is characterized by intellectual disability with variable cardiovascular, ophthalmologic and minor skeletal anomalies. Missense variants in the PWWP domain of ZMYND8 abolish the interaction with Drebrin and missense variants in the MYND domain disrupt the interaction with GATAD2A. ZMYND8 is broadly expressed across cell types in all brain regions and shows highest expression in the early stages of brain development. Neuronal knockdown of the DrosophilaZMYND8 ortholog results in decreased habituation learning, consistent with a role in cognitive function. CONCLUSION: We present genomic and functional evidence for disruption of ZMYND8 as a novel etiology of syndromic intellectual disability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genes such as SETD5, KMT2A, CREBBP, EP300, CHD7, SIN3A, and ZMYND8 significantly influence the spatiotemporal expression of neurodevelopmental and synapse-related genes.
“Genes such as SETD5, KMT2A, CREBBP, EP300, CHD7, SIN3A, and ZMYND8 significantly influence the spatiotemporal expression of neurodevelopmental and synapse-related genes (Dias et al., 2022; Ahsan et al., 2023).”
From Biological hierarchy from genotype to phenotype in syndromic and non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder (2026) · cites this paper as Dias et al., 2022
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes ZMYND8 as involved in chromatin-mediated transcription regulation, and the Results (page unavailable) show that ZMYND8’s own expression varies across stages of brain development. The paper does not establish that ZMYND8 controls the spatiotemporal expression of neurodevelopmental or synapse-related genes, or support that claim for the other six named genes. Its measurement of ZMYND8 expression is not a measurement of its effects on those genes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · see citing works
Tran, M. N., Maynard, K. R., Spangler, A., Huuki, L. A., Montgomery, K. D., Sadashivaiah, V., Tippani, M., Barry, B. K., Hancock, D. B., Hicks, S. C., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.001 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Lovelace, J. W., Wen, T. H., Reinhard, S., Hsu, M. S., Sidhu, H., Ethell, I. M., Binder, D. K., & Razak, K. A. (2016) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2016.02.002 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [1]1. Vissers, L.E.L.M. ∙ Gilissen, C. ∙ Veltman, J.A. Genetic studies in intellectual disability and related disorders Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(1):9-18 Crossref Scopus (534) PubMed Google Scholar
- [3]3. Savitsky, P. ∙ Krojer, T. ∙ Fujisawa, T. ... Multivalent histone and DNA engagement by a PHD/BRD/PWWP triple reader cassette recruits ZMYND8 to K14ac-rich chromatin Cell Rep. 2016; 17(10):2724-2737 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (74) PubMed Google Scholar
- [4]4. Collins, B.E. ∙ Greer, C.B. ∙ Coleman, B.C. ... Histone H3 lysine K4 methylation and its role in learning and memory Epigenetics Chromatin. 2019; 12(1):7 Crossref Scopus (116) PubMed Google Scholar
- [5]5. Spruijt, C.G. ∙ Luijsterburg, M.S. ∙ Menafra, R. ... ZMYND8 co-localizes with NuRD on target genes and regulates poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent recruitment of GATAD2A/NuRD to sites of DNA damage Cell Rep. 2016; 17(3):783-798 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (85) PubMed Google Scholar
- [6]6. Malovannaya, A. ∙ Lanz, R.B. ∙ Jung, S.Y. ... Analysis of the human endogenous coregulator complexome Cell. 2011; 145(5):787-799 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (341) PubMed Google Scholar
- [7]7. Ghosh, K. ∙ Tang, M. ∙ Kumari, N. ... Positive regulation of transcription by human ZMYND8 through its association with P-TEFb complex Cell Rep. 2018; 24(8):2141-2154.e6 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (28) PubMed Google Scholar
- [8]8. Yao, N. ∙ Li, J. ∙ Liu, H. ... The structure of the ZMYND8/drebrin complex suggests a cytoplasmic sequestering mechanism of ZMYND8 by drebrin Structure. 2017; 25(11):1657-1666.e3 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (12) PubMed Google Scholar
- [9]9. Gong, F. ∙ Clouaire, T. ∙ Aguirrebengoa, M. ... Histone demethylase KDM5A regulates the ZMYND8-NuRD chromatin remodeler to promote DNA repair J Cell Biol. 2017; 216(7):1959-1974 Crossref Scopus (126) PubMed Google Scholar
- [11]11. Yates, T.M. ∙ Drucker, M. ∙ Barnicoat, A. ... ZMYND11-related syndromic intellectual disability: 16 patients delineating and expanding the phenotypic spectrum Hum Mutat. 2020; 41(5):1042-1050 Crossref Scopus (14) PubMed Google Scholar
- [12]12. Riazuddin, S. ∙ Hussain, M. ∙ Razzaq, A. ... Exome sequencing of Pakistani consanguineous families identifies 30 novel candidate genes for recessive intellectual disability Mol Psychiatry. 2017; 22(11):1604-1614 Published correction appears in Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(11):3101-3102 https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.109 Scopus (108) PubMed Google Scholar · DOI
- [13]13. Hu, H. ∙ Kahrizi, K. ∙ Musante, L. ... Genetics of intellectual disability in consanguineous families Mol Psychiatry. 2019; 24(7):1027-1039 Crossref Scopus (139) PubMed Google Scholar
- [14]14. Mayfield, R.D. ∙ Zhu, L. ∙ Smith, T.A. ... The SMYD1 and skNAC transcription factors contribute to neurodegenerative diseases Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020; 9, 100129 Crossref Scopus (7) PubMed Google Scholar
- [15]15. Brookes, E. ∙ Laurent, B. ∙ Õunap, K. ... Mutations in the intellectual disability gene KDM5C reduce protein stability and demethylase activity Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(10):2861-2872 Crossref Scopus (58) PubMed Google Scholar
- [16]16. Rueda-Robles, A. ∙ Audano, M. ∙ Álvarez-Mercado, A.I. ... Functions of SMYD proteins in biological processes: what do we know? An updated review Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021; 712, 109040 Crossref Scopus (14) PubMed Google Scholar
- [17]17. Suzuki, T. ∙ Suzuki, T. ∙ Raveau, M. ... A recurrent PJA1 variant in trigonocephaly and neurodevelopmental disorders Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020; 7(7):1117-1131 Crossref Scopus (16) PubMed Google Scholar
- [18]18. Sobreira, N. ∙ Schiettecatte, F. ∙ Valle, D. ... GeneMatcher: A matching tool for connecting investigators with an interest in the same gene Hum Mutat. 2015; 36(10):928-930 Crossref Scopus (1044) PubMed Google Scholar
- [20]20. Wiel, L. ∙ Baakman, C. ∙ Gilissen, D. ... MetaDome: pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains Hum Mutat. 2019; 40(8):1030-1038 Crossref Scopus (171) PubMed Google Scholar
- [24]24. Venselaar, H. ∙ Te Beek, T.A. ∙ Kuipers, R.K. ... Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:548 Crossref Scopus (780) PubMed Google Scholar
- [25]25. Pettersen, E.F. ∙ Goddard, T.D. ∙ Huang, C.C. ... UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers Protein Sci. 2021; 30(1):70-82 Crossref Scopus (3735) PubMed Google Scholar
- [26]26. Shapovalov, M.V. ∙ Dunbrack, R.L. A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions Structure. 2011; 19(6):844-858 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (663) PubMed Google Scholar
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qing, Z., Yin, Z., Chen, B., Rao, Z., Yin, D., Li, D., Lu, Y., Shi, M., Li, S., Xu, Y., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1964684
“Genes such as SETD5 , KMT2A , CREBBP , EP300 , CHD7 , SIN3A , and ZMYND8 significantly influence the spatiotemporal expression of neurodevelopmental and synapse-related genes (Dias et al., 2022; Ahsan et al., 2023).”
- Authors
- Dias, K.-R., Carlston, C. M., Blok, L. E. R., De Hayr, L., Nawaz, U., Evans, C.-A., Bayrak-Toydemir, P., Htun, S., Zhu, Y., Ma, A., Lynch, S. A., Moorwood, C., Stals, K., Ellard, S., Bainbridge, M. N., Friedman, J., Pappas, J. G., Rabin, R., Nowak, C. B., Douglas, J., Wilson, T. E., Guillen Sacoto, M. J., Mullegama, S. V., Palculict, T. B., Kirk, E. P., Pinner, J. R., Edwards, M., Montanari, F., Graziano, C., Pippucci, T., Dingmann, B., Glass, I., Mefford, H. C., Shimoji, T., Suzuki, T., Yamakawa, K., Streff, H., Schaaf, C. P., Slavotinek, A. M., Voineagu, I., Carey, J. C., Buckley, M. F., Schenck, A., Harvey, R. J., & Roscioli, T.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Temple Street Children's University Hospital (IE)
- Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Indiana University Health (US)
- Hunter Genetics (AU)
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
- Nagoya City University (JP)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Roscioli, Tony
- ORCID
- Dias, Kerith-Rae
- Carlston, Colleen M.
- Blok, Laura E.R.
- Nawaz, Urwah
- Evans, Carey-Anne
- Zhu, Ying
- Ma, Alan
- Lynch, Sally Ann
- Moorwood, Catherine
- Stals, Karen
- Ellard, Sian
- Bainbridge, Matthew N.
- Friedman, Jennifer
- Pappas, John G.
- Rabin, Rachel
- Mullegama, Sureni V.
- Kirk, Edwin P.
- Pinner, Jason R.
- Edwards, Matthew
- Montanari, Francesca
- Graziano, Claudio
- Pippucci, Tommaso
- Glass, Ian
- Mefford, Heather C.
- Shimoji, Takeyoshi
- Suzuki, Toshimitsu
- Yamakawa, Kazuhiro
- Streff, Haley
- Schaaf, Christian P.
- Slavotinek, Anne M.
- Voineagu, Irina
- Carey, John C.
- Buckley, Michael F.
- Schenck, Annette
- Roscioli, Tony
- Venue
- Genetics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1952-1966
- ISSN
- 1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4289339416
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
- Indiana University Health
- Hunter New England Local Health District
- Neuroscience Research Australia
- ARUP Laboratories
- NSW Health Pathology
- University of New South Wales
- University of Sydney
- University of Adelaide
- University of the Sunshine Coast
- ZonMw
- Radboud Universiteit
- Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
- NSW Ministry of Health
- Nagoya City University
- Western Sydney University
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
- University of California, San Diego
- School of Medicine
- School of Medicine, Indiana University
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1117394)
- Sydney Medical School
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Keywords
- ZMYND8, de novo mutations, syndromic intellectual disability, cardiac anomalies, PWWP domain, MYND domain, drebrin, GATAD2A, missense mutations, habituation, brain development, transcriptional regulation, chromatin remodeling
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Exome Sequencing, Brain, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Neurodevelopmental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review