Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Library Science and AdministrationInformation Science and LibrariesInformation Society and Technology Trends

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information asymmetry and information sharing

Clarkson, Gavin, Jacobsen, Trond E., Batcheller, Archer L.·2007·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Clarkson, 2002, Reclaiming jurisprudential sovereignty: A tribal judiciary analysis, Kansas Law Review, 50, 473
  2. Fairchild, 1998, Municipal bond disclosure: Remaining inadequacies of mandatory disclosure under rule 15c2-12, 23 Iowa Journal of Corporate, 439
  3. Sethi, 2002, Social construction, organizational identity, and market orientation of the firm, American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings, 13, 183
  4. Yuan, 2005, Individual participation in organizational information commons, Human Communication Research, 31, 212, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00870.x · DOI

Cited by

Items 101–109 of 109

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Clarkson, G., Jacobsen, T. E., & Batcheller, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Clarkson, Gavin
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
827-839
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001
OpenAlex
W1976749375
Cited by
109
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
Keywords
information asymmetry, information sharing, digital divide, Native American tribes, law enforcement data sharing, information poverty, inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.