The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK
Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kurunananda, A. (2009) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1002/itdj.20122 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence
Schiff, D. S., Schiff, K. J., & Pierson, P. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12742 · Cited by 155
Lopes, K. M. G., Macadar, M. A., & Luciano, E. M. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2018-0081 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Karunasena, K., & Deng, H.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-84
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160772997
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005
- The paper
- Karunasena, K., & Deng, H. (2012). Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
