The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Exploring the tensions and incongruities of Internet governance in Africa
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While internet capabilities in developing countries, such as some in Africa, have rapidly evolved over the last decade, it is slow and limited compared to developed countries [37].”
From Seeking, Reading, and Use of Scholarly Articles: An International Study of Perceptions and Behavior of Researchers (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
Reid, A., & Anderson, B. (1985) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2759245 · Cited by 25,901
Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Fukuyama, F., & Scott, J. C. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048980 · Cited by 8,396
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
(2000) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00155-5 · Cited by 5,201
Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide
Tefft, S. (2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1165 · Cited by 2,934
The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics
Li, T. M. (2007) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 2,437
The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon
van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240309487 · Cited by 1,616
Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order
Ferguson, J. (2006) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1,350
Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order
Bastian, M. L. (2007) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417507000709 · Cited by 1,031
The Global War for Internet Governance
DeNardis, L. (2014) · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300181357.001.0001 · Cited by 401
The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies
Žalnieriūtė, M. (2013) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.05.008 · Cited by 312
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Rao, 2005, 22, 361
- Rooney, 2005, 22, 405
Cited by
The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa
Solomon, E. M., & van Klyton, A. (2020) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2020.101104 · Cited by 269
Tenopir, C., Christian, L., & Kaufman, J. (2019) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications7010018 · Cited by 42
“While internet capabilities in developing countries, such as some in Africa, have rapidly evolved over the last decade, it is slow and limited compared to developed countries [37].”
BackgroundSME finance and the construction of value in Rwanda
van Klyton, A. C., & Ngoga, S. R. (2017) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-02-2017-0046 · Cited by 30
Contestations of Internet Governance and Digital Authoritarianism in Pakistan
Ahmed, Z. S., Yılmaz, İ., Akbarzadeh, S., & Bashirov, G. (2024) · International Journal of Politics Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-024-09493-2 · Cited by 15
Tossou, S. H., Okou, F. A. Y., & Kpanou, S. B.-V. K. (2020) · Journal of African Development · doi:10.5325/jafrideve.21.1.0068 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Holden, K., & Van Klyton, A.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Holden, Kerry
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 736-745
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2504741743
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- internet governance, Africa, multistakeholder model, national ICT policy, stakeholder engagement, digital divide, disempowerment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
