CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363Ethics and Social Impacts of AIE-Government and Public ServicesSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance

Janssen, Marijn, Kuk, George·2016·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barocas, 2016, Big Data's Disparate Impact (August 14, 2015), California Law Review, 104
  2. Sandvig, 2014, Seeing the Sort: The Aesthetic and Industrial Defense of “The Algorithm”, Journal of the New Media Causes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 363

Related

Metadata

Authors
Janssen, M., & Kuk, G.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Marijn
ORCID
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
371-377
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011
OpenAlex
W2527349292
Cited by
363
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
big data algorithms, technocratic governance, algorithmic bias, algorithmic accountability, governmentality, algorithmic transparency, data curation, algorithmic discrimination, institutional logics, algorithmic governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review