Cited by 6Community Health and DevelopmentService-Learning and Community EngagementParticipatory Visual Research Methods

Community-driven epidemiologic research: Guiding principles

Open access
Goodman, Karen J., Geary, Janis, Walker, Emily, Fagan-Garcia, Katharine, Archie, Billy, Lennie, Crystal, Munday, Rachel, McAlpine, Laura +3 more·2019·Global Epidemiology

Abstract

Increasingly, public health research standards call for engaging communities who live with health issues under investigation to help ensure that results translate into effective public health measures. Here, we share guiding principles for community-driven epidemiologic research developed over a decade conducting research sought and controlled by participating communities. These principles provide a roadmap for epidemiologic research that effectively addresses community priorities while meeting academic standards: research questions are developed collaboratively in community-university partnerships; knowledge takes shape from information donated by participants through methods that turn information into scientifically useful data and analysis that reveals data patterns that address research questions; thus, knowledge is generated collaboratively by academic researchers and community partners; academic researchers are bound by ethical, professional, scientific, contractual, and other legal standards to be responsible stewards of information donated by participants; community review protocols ensure that interpretation and presentation of research results reflect the voices of all partners; meaningful community review creates the trust needed for open access to research results as required of academic researchers; all partners share credit for achievements. Lacking models for operationalizing these principles, we developed specific guidelines for research project initiation, data use, authorship, acknowledgment, and data dissemination. Conventions in academia present formidable challenges to effective community engagement and are often at odds with calls from community organizations and funding agencies to conduct research driven by community priorities and values. We hope others can benefit from time and effort we have spent crafting solutions that bridge this divide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloepi.2019.100013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Community-based participatory epidemiology, community-driven epidemiology, and culturally safe epidemiology have emerged in response to growing recognition of limitations of the modern epidemiology paradigm, including focus on individual risk, inability to account for interaction of risk factors, and dearth of engagement with public health interventions.

    “All of these approaches have emerged in response to the growing recognition of the limitations of the modern epidemiology paradigm, including its focus on individual risk to the detriment of understanding community contexts, an inability to account for the interaction of different risk factors, and a dearth of engagement or influence on actual public health interventions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, K. J., Geary, J., Walker, E., Fagan-Garcia, K., Archie, B., Lennie, C., Munday, R., McAlpine, L., Colquhoun, A., Chang, H.-J., & Assi, A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Karen J.
Venue
Global Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
1
Pages
100013
ISSN
2590-1133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982096033
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
  • ArcticNet
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
community-led research, community participation, university-community collaboration, research ethics, data stewardship, research dissemination, research guidelines, community priorities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review