Community-driven epidemiologic research: Guiding principles
Open accessAbstract
Increasingly, public health research standards call for engaging communities who live with health issues under investigation to help ensure that results translate into effective public health measures. Here, we share guiding principles for community-driven epidemiologic research developed over a decade conducting research sought and controlled by participating communities. These principles provide a roadmap for epidemiologic research that effectively addresses community priorities while meeting academic standards: research questions are developed collaboratively in community-university partnerships; knowledge takes shape from information donated by participants through methods that turn information into scientifically useful data and analysis that reveals data patterns that address research questions; thus, knowledge is generated collaboratively by academic researchers and community partners; academic researchers are bound by ethical, professional, scientific, contractual, and other legal standards to be responsible stewards of information donated by participants; community review protocols ensure that interpretation and presentation of research results reflect the voices of all partners; meaningful community review creates the trust needed for open access to research results as required of academic researchers; all partners share credit for achievements. Lacking models for operationalizing these principles, we developed specific guidelines for research project initiation, data use, authorship, acknowledgment, and data dissemination. Conventions in academia present formidable challenges to effective community engagement and are often at odds with calls from community organizations and funding agencies to conduct research driven by community priorities and values. We hope others can benefit from time and effort we have spent crafting solutions that bridge this divide.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community-based participatory epidemiology, community-driven epidemiology, and culturally safe epidemiology have emerged in response to growing recognition of limitations of the modern epidemiology paradigm, including focus on individual risk, inability to account for interaction of risk factors, and dearth of engagement with public health interventions.
“All of these approaches have emerged in response to the growing recognition of the limitations of the modern epidemiology paradigm, including its focus on individual risk to the detriment of understanding community contexts, an inability to account for the interaction of different risk factors, and a dearth of engagement or influence on actual public health interventions.”
From Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Goodman et al., 2019
Cites
Leung, M. W. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh010 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada
Hayward, A., Wodtke, L., Craft, A., Robin, T., Smylie, J., McConkey, S., Nychuk, A., Healy, C., Star, L., & Cidro, J. (2021) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100899 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“6 interpretation (Goodman et al., 2019); however, community-driven epidemiology can go further by engaging communities in “shared planning and oversight of biomedical epidemiologic research that addresses their priorities, incorporating local knowledge, approaches to knowledge-seeking, and values” (Goodman et al.”
Background
- Authors
- Goodman, K. J., Geary, J., Walker, E., Fagan-Garcia, K., Archie, B., Lennie, C., Munday, R., McAlpine, L., Colquhoun, A., Chang, H.-J., & Assi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Karen J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 100013
- ISSN
- 2590-1133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982096033
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
- Funders
- Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
- ArcticNet
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- community-led research, community participation, university-community collaboration, research ethics, data stewardship, research dissemination, research guidelines, community priorities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review