mvPPT: A Highly Efficient and Sensitive Pathogenicity Prediction Tool for Missense Variants
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies both boost the discovery of variants in the human genome and exacerbate the challenges of pathogenic variant identification. In this study, we developed Pathogenicity Prediction Tool for missense variants (mvPPT), a highly sensitive and accurate missense variant classifier based on gradient boosting. mvPPT adopts high-confidence training sets with a wide spectrum of variant profiles, and extracts three categories of features, including scores from existing prediction tools, frequencies (allele frequencies, amino acid frequencies, and genotype frequencies), and genomic context. Compared with established predictors, mvPPT achieves superior performance in all test sets, regardless of data source. In addition, our study also provides guidance for training set and feature selection strategies, as well as reveals highly relevant features, which may further provide biological insights into variant pathogenicity. mvPPT is freely available at http://www.mvppt.club/.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 4,408 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…pathogenicity likelihood scores assessed by different component tools, including Sorting Tolerant From Intolerant (SIFT) [10], MutationAssessor [15], Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) [45], GERP++RS [46], phyloP [47], phastCons [48], and SIte-specific PHYlogenetic analysis (SiPhy) [49].”
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Tong, S.-Y., Fan, K., Zhou, Z.-W., Liu, L.-Y., Zhang, S.-Q., Fu, Y., Wang, G.-Z., Zhu, Y., & Yu, Y.-C.
- Affiliations
- Jing’an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032 , China
- Fudan University (CN)
- Shanghai Xunyin Biotechnology Co., Ltd. , Shanghai 201802 , China
- Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Ying
- Yu, Yong-Chun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-08-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 414-426
- ISSN
- 1672-0229 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-3244
- PMC
- PMC10626173
- OpenAlex
- W4289936559
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program of China (2021ZD0202500)
- Shanghai Natural Science Foundation, China (20ZR1403800)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900476, 82071259, 31930044, 31725012)
- Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2018SHZDZX01)
- Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, China (2019-01-07-00-07-E00062)
- Collaborative Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, China (2020CXJQ01)
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021ZD0202500)
- Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
- Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31725012, 31900476, 31930044, 82071259)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (20ZR1403800)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- pathogenic variant classification, gradient boosting, allele frequency, amino acid frequency, genotype frequency, feature selection, training set construction, variant pathogenicity
- MeSH terms
- Gene Frequency, Humans, Virulence, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review