Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crustal growth in the North China Craton at ~2.5Ga: Evidence from in situ zircon U–Pb ages, Hf isotopes and whole-rock geochemistry of the Dengfeng complex

Open access
Diwu, Chunrong, Sun, Yong, Guo, Anlin, Wang, Hongliang, Liu, Xiaoming·2011·Gondwana Research

Abstract

The Dengfeng complex is located on the southern margin of the North China Craton (NCC) and belongs to the southern portion of the Trans-North China Orogen. This terrane is important to understand the formation and evolution of NCC during late Neoarchean (~ 2.5 Ga). The Dengfeng complex is well exposed in the Junzhao region and comprises two distinct lithologic units: supracrustal assemblage and plutonic rocks . LA-ICPMS magmatic zircon U–Pb age data shows that the rocks formed within the range of 2547–2504 Ma. The available Hf isotope data indicate that the majority of ca. 2.5 Ga zircons from the Dengfeng complex have high ε Hf ( t ) values close to the initial Hf isotope ratios of the contemporaneous depleted mantle. These data indicate that the rocks in the Dengfeng represent juvenile crust. The TTG gneisses in the Dengfeng complex display low Mg # (41–48), MgO (< 2 wt.%), Cr (6–14 ppm), Ni (9–22 ppm) contents and low Nb/Ta ratio (6–12), which are interpreted to have been produced by the partial melting of a flatly subducted slab. The metadiorites of the Dengfeng complex are typically characterized by high Mg # (59–69), MgO (3.5–6.6 wt.%), Ni (82–130 ppm) and Cr (148–237 ppm) abundances, elevated Sr (1759–1927 ppm) and Ba (1742–2289 ppm) concentrations, and high LREE (La N = 38–487). Such geochemical features are similar to Archean sanukitoids . A two-stage model is applied here to explain the genesis of metadiorites of Dengfeng complex: (1) firstly, the mantle is metasomatized either by melts or by aqueous fluids from a subducted slab; (2) subsequently, sanukitoid magmas were produced by partial melting of the hybridized mantle. Furthermore, the amphibolites of supracrustal rocks have a mixture of MORB- and arc-like geochemical affinities, suggesting the development of a back-arc in the southern NCC at ca. 2.5 Ga. The contemporary late Neoarchean TTGs, sanukitoids and MORB-back arc association may represent a late Neoarchean tectonic mélange, implying a Neoarchean subduction–accretion process which would suggest that modern-style plate tectonics processes was probably initiated in the southern NCC by 2.5 Ga.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.011

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Diwu, C., Sun, Y., Guo, A., Wang, H., & Liu, X.
Venue
Gondwana Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
149-170
ISSN
1342-937X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043493161
Cited by
275
References
105
FWCI
19.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crustal growth in the North China Craton at ~2.5Ga: Evidence from in situ zircon U–Pb ages, Hf isotopes and whole-rock geochemistry of the Dengfeng complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.011
The paper
Diwu, C., Sun, Y., Guo, A., Wang, H., & Liu, X. (2011). Crustal growth in the North China Craton at ~2.5Ga: Evidence from in situ zircon U–Pb ages, Hf isotopes and whole-rock geochemistry of the Dengfeng complex. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.