The boring billion? – Lid tectonics, continental growth and environmental change associated with the Columbia supercontinent
Open accessAbstract
The evolution of Earth's biosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere is tied to the formation of continental crust and its subsequent movements on tectonic plates. The supercontinent cycle posits that the continental crust is periodically amalgamated into a single landmass, subsequently breaking up and dispersing into various continental fragments. Columbia is possibly the first true supercontinent, it amalgamated during the 2.0–1.7 Ga period, and collisional orogenesis resulting from its formation peaked at 1.95–1.85 Ga. Geological and palaeomagnetic evidence indicate that Columbia remained as a quasi-integral continental lid until at least 1.3 Ga. Numerous break-up attempts are evidenced by dyke swarms with a large temporal and spatial range; however, palaeomagnetic and geologic evidence suggest these attempts remained unsuccessful. Rather than dispersing into continental fragments, the Columbia supercontinent underwent only minor modifications to form the next supercontinent (Rodinia) at 1.1–0.9 Ga; these included the transformation of external accretionary belts into the internal Grenville and equivalent collisional belts. Although Columbia provides evidence for a form of ‘lid tectonics’, modern style plate tectonics occurred on its periphery in the form of accretionary orogens. The detrital zircon and preserved geological record are compatible with an increase in the volume of continental crust during Columbia's lifespan; this is a consequence of the continuous accretionary processes along its margins. The quiescence in plate tectonic movements during Columbia's lifespan is correlative with a long period of stability in Earth's atmospheric and oceanic chemistry. Increased variability starting at 1.3 Ga in the environmental record coincides with the transformation of Columbia to Rodinia; thus, the link between plate tectonics and environmental change is strengthened with this interpretation of supercontinent history.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A supercontinent did form during the boring billion.
“In apparent contradiction to these observations, however, a supercontinent did form, as reviewed by Roberts (2013; see also Evans, 2013, and Cawood and Hawkesworth, 2014).”
From Oxygenation, Life, and the Planetary System during Earth's Middle History: An Overview (2021) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 140 · Cited by 213
- Authors
- Roberts, N. M. W.
- Affiliations
- British Geological Survey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Nick M.W.
- ORCID
- Roberts, Nick M.W.
- Venue
- Geoscience Frontiers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 681-691
- ISSN
- 1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127567173
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscience Frontiers (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Keywords
- Columbia supercontinent, supercontinent cycles, crustal growth, continental crust, Rodinia, Grenville orogeny, accretionary orogens, dyke swarms, paleomagnetism, detrital zircon, environmental change, Precambrian tectonics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review