The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies towards statistically robust interpretations of in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology
Open accessAbstract
Zircon U–Pb geochronology has become a keystone tool across Earth science, arguably providing the gold standard in resolving deep geological time. The development of rapid in situ analysis of zircon (via laser ablation and secondary ionization mass spectrometry) has allowed for large amounts of data to be generated in a relatively short amount of time and such large volume datasets offer the ability to address a range of geological questions that would otherwise remain intractable (e.g. detrital zircons as a sediment fingerprinting method). The ease of acquisition, while bringing benefit to the Earth science community, has also led to diverse interpretations of geochronological data. In this work we seek to refocus U–Pb zircon geochronology toward best practice by providing a robust statistically coherent workflow. We discuss a range of data filtering approaches and their inherent limitations (e.g. discordance and the reduced chi-squared; MSWD). We evaluate appropriate mechanisms to calculate the most geologically appropriate age from both 238U/206Pb and 207Pb/206Pb ratios and demonstrate the cross over position when chronometric power swaps between these ratios. As our in situ analytical techniques become progressively more precise, appropriate statistical handing of U–Pb datasets will become increasingly pertinent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kernel density estimation via diffusion
Botev, Z. I., Grotowski, J. F., & Kroese, D. P. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos799 · Cited by 1,689
Dickinson, W. R., & Gehrels, G. E. (2009) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.013 · Cited by 1,581
On the visualisation of detrital age distributions
Vermeesch, P. (2012) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.04.021 · Cited by 1,530
Mattinson, J. M. (2005) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.03.011 · Cited by 1,476
Cherniak, D. J., & Watson, E. B. (2001) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(00)00233-3 · Cited by 1,244
Detrital Zircon Analysis of the Sedimentary Record
Fedo, C. M. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0530277 · Cited by 948
On the Treatment of Concordant Uranium-Lead Ages
Ludwig, K. R. (1998) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00059-3 · Cited by 837
238 U/ 235 U Systematics in Terrestrial Uranium-Bearing Minerals
Hiess, J., Condon, D. J., McLean, N., & Noble, S. R. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215507 · Cited by 822
Detrital Zircon U-Pb Geochronology Applied to Tectonics
Gehrels, G. (2014) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124012 · Cited by 812
The statistical distribution of the mean squared weighted deviation
Wendt, I., & Carl, C. (1991) · Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section · doi:10.1016/0168-9622(91)90010-t · Cited by 722
Cited by
Geochronological constraint on the Cambrian Chengjiang biota, South China
Yang, C., Li, X.-H., Zhu, M., Condon, D. J., & Chen, J. (2018) · Journal of the Geological Society · doi:10.1144/jgs2017-103 · Cited by 87
An appraisal of the ages of Phanerozoic large igneous provinces
Jiang, Q., Jourdan, F., Olierook, H. K. H., & Merle, R. E. (2023) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104314 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, C. J., Kirkland, C. L., & Taylor, R. J. M.
- Venue
- Geoscience Frontiers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 581-589
- ISSN
- 1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2195287487
- Cited by
- 732
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 28.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies towards statistically robust interpretations of in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.11.006
- The paper
- Spencer, C. J., Kirkland, C. L., & Taylor, R. J. M. (2016). Strategies towards statistically robust interpretations of in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. Geoscience Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.11.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.