Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran

Open access
Thi Ngo, Phuong Thao, Panahi, Mahdi, Khosravi, Khabat, Ghorbanzadeh, Omid, Kariminejad, Narges, Cerda, Artemi, Lee, Saro·2021·Geoscience Frontiers

Abstract

The identification of landslide-prone areas is an essential step in landslide hazard assessment and mitigation of landslide-related losses. In this study, we applied two novel deep learning algorithms, the recurrent neural network (RNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN), for national-scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. We prepared a dataset comprising 4069 historical landslide locations and 11 conditioning factors (altitude, slope degree, profile curvature, distance to river, aspect, plan curvature, distance to road, distance to fault, rainfall, geology and land-sue) to construct a geospatial database and divided the data into the training and the testing dataset. We then developed RNN and CNN algorithms to generate landslide susceptibility maps of Iran using the training dataset. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and used the area under the curve (AUC) for the quantitative evaluation of the landslide susceptibility maps using the testing dataset. Better performance in both the training and testing phases was provided by the RNN algorithm (AUC ​= ​0.88) than by the CNN algorithm (AUC ​= ​0.85). Finally, we calculated areas of susceptibility for each province and found that 6% and 14% of the land area of Iran is very highly and highly susceptible to future landslide events, respectively, with the highest susceptibility in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province (33.8%). About 31% of cities of Iran are located in areas with high and very high landslide susceptibility. The results of the present study will be useful for the development of landslide hazard mitigation strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Metadata

Authors
Thi Ngo, P. T., Panahi, M., Khosravi, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Kariminejad, N., Cerda, A., & Lee, S.
Venue
Geoscience Frontiers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
505-519
ISSN
1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048285196
Cited by
406
References
50
FWCI
59.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013
The paper
Thi Ngo, P. T., Panahi, M., Khosravi, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Kariminejad, N., Cerda, A., & Lee, S. (2021). Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geoscience Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.