The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenic contamination of groundwater: A global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula
Open accessAbstract
More than 2.5 billion people on the globe rely on groundwater for drinking and providing high-quality drinking water has become one of the major challenges of human society. Although groundwater is considered as safe, high concentrations of heavy metals like arsenic (As) can pose potential human health concerns and hazards. In this paper, we present an overview of the current scenario of arsenic contamination of groundwater in various countries across the globe with an emphasis on the Indian Peninsula. With several newly affected regions reported during the last decade, a significant increase has been observed in the global scenario of arsenic contamination. It is estimated that nearly 108 countries are affected by arsenic contamination in groundwater (with concentration beyond maximum permissible limit of 10 ppb recommended by the World Health Organization. The highest among these are from Asia (32) and Europe (31), followed by regions like Africa (20), North America (11), South America (9) and Australia (4). More than 230 million people worldwide, which include 180 million from Asia, are at risk of arsenic poisoning. Southeast Asian countries, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, China, Nepal, Vietnam, Burma, Thailand and Cambodia, are the most affected. In India, 20 states and 4 Union Territories have so far been affected by arsenic contamination in groundwater. An attempt to evaluate the correlation between arsenic poisoning and aquifer type shows that the groundwater extracted from unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers, particularly those which are located within the younger orogenic belts of the world, are the worst affected. More than 90% of arsenic pollution is inferred to be geogenic. We infer that alluvial sediments are the major source for arsenic contamination in groundwater and we postulate a strong relation with plate tectonic processes, mountain building, erosion and sedimentation. Prolonged consumption of arsenic-contaminated groundwater results in severe health issues like skin, lung, kidney and bladder cancer; coronary heart disease; bronchiectasis; hyperkeratosis and arsenicosis. Since the major source of arsenic in groundwater is of geogenic origin, the extend of pollution is complexly linked with aquifer geometry and aquifer properties of a region. Therefore, remedial measures are to be designed based on the source mineral, climatological and hydrogeological scenario of the affected region. The corrective measures available include removing arsenic from groundwater using filters, exploring deeper or alternative aquifers, treatment of the aquifer itself, dilution method by artificial recharge to groundwater, conjunctive use, and installation of nano-filter, among other procedures. The vast majority of people affected by arsenic contamination in the Asian countries are the poor who live in rural areas and are not aware of the arsenic poisoning and treatment protocols. Therefore, creating awareness and providing proper medical care to these people remain as a great challenge. Very few policy actions have been taken at international level over the past decade to reduce arsenic contamination in drinking water, with the goal of preventing toxic impacts on human health. We recommend that that United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and WHO should take stock of the global arsenic poisoning situation and launch a global drive to create awareness among people/medical professionals/health workers/administrators on this global concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spatial and Temporal Variations of Groundwater Arsenic in South and Southeast Asia
Fendorf, S., Michael, H. A., & van Geen, A. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172974 · Cited by 1,193
Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and Drinking Water in Vietnam: A Human Health Threat
Berg, M., Tran, H. C., Nguyen, T. C., Pham, H. V., Schertenleib, R., & Giger, W. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es010027y · Cited by 1,096
Cited by
Fresh water resource, scarcity, water salinity challenges and possible remedies: A review
Musie, W., & Gonfa, G. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18685 · Cited by 432
Machine learning in natural and engineered water systems
Huang, R., Ma, C., Ma, J., Huangfu, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117666 · Cited by 319
Moghimi Dehkordi, M., Pournuroz Nodeh, Z., Soleimani Dehkordi, K., salmanvandi, H., Rasouli Khorjestan, R., & Ghaffarzadeh, M. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102729 · Cited by 296
Fatoki, J. O., & Badmus, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100052 · Cited by 280
Use of Microbial Consortia in Bioremediation of Metalloid Polluted Environments
Lashani, E., Amoozegar, M. A., Turner, R. J., & Moghimi, H. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11040891 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaji, E., Santosh, M., Sarath, K. V., Prakash, P., Deepchand, V., & Divya, B. V.
- Venue
- Geoscience Frontiers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 101079
- ISSN
- 1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089869686
- Cited by
- 1,043
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic contamination of groundwater: A global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
- The paper
- Shaji, E., Santosh, M., Sarath, K. V., Prakash, P., Deepchand, V., & Divya, B. V. (2021). Arsenic contamination of groundwater: A global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula. Geoscience Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.