Follow-up of Celiac Disease
Abstract
Currently, the only effective treatment for celiac disease is complete removal of gluten from the diet. However, patients need to follow a strict gluten-free diet that results in symptomatic, serologic, and histologic remission in most patients. Histologic remission is usually complete in children, but recovery is slower and more frequently incomplete in adults. When remission has been achieved, yearly follow-up is recommended for adults, children, and adolescents. This article deals with conventional strategies used in order to follow-up patients on treatment and aiming to obtain the best clinical outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Normalization of serology is widely used during follow-up as a proxy for mucosal healing in children with high positive and negative predictive values.
“Normalization of serology is widely used during follow-up as a proxy for mucosal healing in children with high positive and negative predictive values (21-23).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Factors Associated with Dietary Adherence in Celiac Disease: A Nationwide Study
Kurppa, K., Lauronen, O., Collin, P., Ukkola, A., Laurila, K., Huhtala, H., Mäki, M., & Kaukinen, K. (2012) · Digestion · doi:10.1159/000341416 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Serum Vitamins and Minerals at Diagnosis and Follow‐up in Children With Celiac Disease
Deora, V., Aylward, N., Sokoro, A., & El‐Matary, W. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001475 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Vécsei, E., Steinwendner, S., Kogler, H., Innerhofer, A., Hammer, K., Haas, O. A., Amann, G., Chott, A., Vogelsang, H., Schoenlechner, R., et al. (2014) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/1471-230x-14-28 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease.
Mearin, M. L., Agardh, D., Antunes, H., Al‐toma, A., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Catassi, C., Ciacci, C., Discepolo, V., Dolinsek, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003540 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Husby, S., & Bai, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Husby, Steffen
- Venue
- Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-136
- ISSN
- 0889-8553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904869362
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastroenterology Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- celiac disease, follow-up, gluten-free diet, remission, histological remission, children, adolescents, adults, treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Quality of Life, Referral and Consultation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Role, Diet, Gluten-Free, Nutritionists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
