Cited by 47Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Réseau sentinelle Audipog 2004-2005. Partie 1: Résultats des principaux indicateurs périnatals

Vendittelli, F., Rivière, O., Crenn-Hébert, C., Claris, O., Tessier, V., Pinquier, D., Teurnier, F., Lansac, J. +1 more·2008·Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité

Abstract

Objective To present the principal perinatal indicators for 2004-2005, based on data from the Audipog sentinel network. Patients and methods The database for 2004 and 2005 covers 71,406 pregnancies from 86 maternity units throughout the year. We constructed a random subsample each year by including only the births occurring during a single month for each maternity ward. Our study therefore analyzes 6987 pregnancies in 2004 and 7648 pregnancies in 2005. Results The number of women working during pregnancy increased between 2004 and 2005 (62.3% versus 66.3%) (p=0.0008) as did the percentage with a postsecondary education (35.1% versus 41.9%) (p<0.0001). The percentage of amniocenteses declined (10.4% versus 7.9%) (p<0.0001). Use of prenatal care improved: more women had prenatal visits before week 14 (30.5% versus 33.9%) (p=0.0002), and fewer women had no prenatal care at all (1.1% versus 0.4%) (p=0.0003). The percentage of preterm deliveries was 6.4% in 2004 and 7% in 2005 (p=0.14) and the percentage of induced preterm deliveries was 37% in 2004 and 41.2% in 2005 (p=0.18). The cesarean rate was essentially stable (19 and 19.2%) and the rate of instrumental intervention in vaginal deliveries fell from 13.1% in 2004 to 11.2% in 2005 (p=0.0015). Discussion and conclusion The rates of cesarean and of preterm deliveries remained stable between 2004 and 2005, but the rate of induced preterm deliveries rose. These indicators are consistent with trends that began earlier.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.08.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In France, the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was approximately 5% in 2004-2005, 11.6% in 2013, and up to 22.5% in 2016.

    “It has had an influence on the GDM prevalence, which was estimated at approximately 5% in 2004–2005 [112], 11.6% in 2013 [113], and even up to 22.5% in 2016 [114].”
  • France accepted new IADPSG criteria in 2010 and uses a one-step strategy to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “France accepted new IADPSG criteria in 2010 and uses one-step strategy to screen for GDM.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vendittelli, F., Rivière, O., Crenn-Hébert, C., Claris, O., Tessier, V., Pinquier, D., Teurnier, F., Lansac, J., & Maria, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges (FR)
Corresponding author
Vendittelli, F.
Venue
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1091-1100
ISSN
1297-9589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983567966
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
maternal employment during pregnancy, prenatal care, amniocentesis, preterm birth, cesarean section rate, instrumental delivery, maternity ward
MeSH terms
Amniocentesis, Cesarean Section, Educational Status, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Information Services, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Women, Working, Perinatal Care, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review