Cited by 7Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesUrologic and reproductive health conditions

Les spermatozoïdes macrocéphales. Quels risques pour la fonction de reproduction ?

Guichaoua, M.-R., Mercier, G., Geoffroy-Siraudin, C., Paulmyer-Lacroix, O., Lanteaume, A., Metzler-Guillemin, C., Perrin, J., Achard, V.·2009·Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité

Abstract

Objective We want to highlight the risk of infertility and failure of Assisted Reproductive Technologies due to the presence of macrocephalic spermatozoa (MS) in the sperm at rate equalling or superior to 20% in at least one semen analysis. Patients and methods We did a retrospective analysis of 19 infertile patients presenting MS at average rate between 14.3 and 49.7%. For each patient, at least one semen analysis showed a MS rate equal or superior to 20%. We did an automated analysis of the spermatozoa surface for 13 patients and a detailed analysis of the MS morphology in 18 patients. Thirteen couples benefited of one or more IVF with or without ICSI. Results The semen analysis shows an impairment of one or more parameter of the sperm in all patients. Three morphological aspects for MS were highlighted: MS with irregular head, MS with regular head, and MS with multiple heads, with a dominance of irregular heads. The spermatozoa surface analysis shows a significant increase of the average surface and of the standard deviation (p Discussion and conclusion We want to sensitize biologist and clinical doctors to the existence of partial forms of this syndrome, which could be related to infertility with impaired sperm parameters and low pregnancy rates after FIV or ICSI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.05.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For patients who do not carry AURKC mutations and who have a lower percentage of macrocephalic spermatozoa, only rare spontaneous births or births after ICSI have been reported.

    “For patients who do not carry AURKC mutations and who have a lower percentage of macrocephalic spermatozoa in the ejaculate, only rare spontaneous births or births after ICSI have been reported [36, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49] and ICSI may be debated [50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guichaoua, M.-R., Mercier, G., Geoffroy-Siraudin, C., Paulmyer-Lacroix, O., Lanteaume, A., Metzler-Guillemin, C., Perrin, J., & Achard, V.
Affiliations
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR)
Corresponding author
Guichaoua, M.-R.
Venue
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
703-711
ISSN
1297-9589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120027462
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urologic and reproductive health conditions
Keywords
sperm morphology, male infertility, assisted reproductive technology failure, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Sperm Count, Sperm Head, Spermatozoa, Pregnancy Rate, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review