Cited by 5Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseLiver physiology and pathology

Indications of pro-inflammatory cytokines in laparoscopic and open liver resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Ng, Kevin Tak-Pan, Pang, Li, Wang, Jia-Qi, She, Wong Hoi, Tsang, Simon Hing-Yin, Lo, Chung Mau, Man, Kwan, Cheung, Tan To·2024·Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International

Abstract

Background Our clinical practice of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) had achieved better short-term and long-term benefits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over open liver resection (OLR), but the underlying mechanisms are not clear. This study was to find out whether systemic inflammation plays an important role. Methods A total of 103 patients with early-stage HCC under liver resection were enrolled (LLR group, n = 53; OLR group, n = 50). The expression of 9 inflammatory cytokines in patients at preoperation, postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD7 was quantified by Luminex Multiplex assay. The relationships of the cytokines and the postoperative outcomes were compared between LLR and OLR. Results Seven of the circulating cytokines were found to be significantly upregulated on POD1 after LLR or OLR compared to their preoperative levels. Compared to OLR, the POD1 levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the LLR group were significantly lower. Higher POD1 levels of these cytokines were significantly correlated with longer operative time and higher volume of blood loss during operation. The levels of these cytokines were positively associated with postoperative liver injury, and the length of hospital stay. Importantly, a high level of IL-6 at POD1 was a risk factor for HCC recurrence and poor disease-free survival after liver resection. Conclusions Significa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.10.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, K. T.-P., Pang, L., Wang, J.-Q., She, W. H., Tsang, S. H.-Y., Lo, C. M., Man, K., & Cheung, T. T.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Cheung, Tan To
Venue
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
257-264
ISSN
  • 2352-9377 (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-3872
OpenAlex
W4387827216
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (JCYJ20210324114403010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
laparoscopic liver resection, open liver resection, early hepatocellular carcinoma, inflammatory cytokines, systemic inflammation, interleukin-6, GM-CSF, interleukin-8, MCP-1, postoperative liver injury, HCC recurrence, disease-free survival, operative time, blood loss
MeSH terms
Hepatectomy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Inflammation, Length of Stay, Liver Neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Interleukin-6, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Interleukin-8

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review