Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments
Abstract
Recently, the healthcare sector has shown a growing interest in information technologies. Two popular health IT (HIT) products are the electronic health record (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE) networks. The introduction of these tools is believed to improve care, but has also raised some important questions and legal and privacy issues. The implementation of these systems has not gone smoothly, and still faces some considerable barriers. This article reviews EHR and HIE to address these obstacles, and analyzes the current state of development and adoption in various countries around the world. Moreover, legal and ethical concerns that may be encountered by EHR users and purchasers are reviewed. Finally, links and interrelations between EHR and HIE and several quality of care issues in today's healthcare domain are examined with a focus on EHR and HIE in the emergency department (ED), whose unique characteristics makes it an environment in which the implementation of such technology may be a major contributor to health, but also faces substantial challenges. The paper ends with a discussion of specific policy implications and recommendations based on an examination of the current limitations of these systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DL models have shown promising results in EHR data analysis and its processing.
“DL models have shown promising results in EHR data analysis and its processing [55], [56]”
From Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 175
- Authors
- Ben-Assuli, O.
- Venue
- Health Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-297
- ISSN
- 0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999124985
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, health information exchange, emergency department, EHR adoption, implementation barriers, health information technology, patient privacy, legal issues, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion of Innovation, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Privacy, Access to Information, Information Dissemination, Internationality, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review