Cited by 39Healthcare Systems and ReformsEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealthcare Policy and Management

Financial protection in Europe: a systematic review of the literature and mapping of data availability

Open access
Yerramilli, Pooja, Fernández, Óscar, Thomson, Sarah·2018·Health Policy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive and context-specific approach to monitoring financial protection can provide valuable evidence on progress towards universal health coverage. OBJECTIVES: This article systematically reviews the literature on financial protection in Europe to identify trends across countries and over time. It also maps the availability of data for regular monitoring in 53 countries. METHODS: Two people independently searched for studies using a standard strategy. Results were extracted from 54 publications and studies analysed in terms of geographical focus, data sources, methods and depth of analysis. RESULTS: Financial protection varies across countries in Europe; substantial changes over time have mainly taken place in the east of the region. Although the data required for regular monitoring are widely available, the literature presents major gaps in geographical scope - most studies focus on middle-income countries; it is not up to date - the latest year of data analysed is 2011; and cross-national comparison is only possible for a handful of countries due to variation in data sources and methods. The literature is also limited in depth. Very few studies go beyond analysing how many people incur catastrophic or impoverishing out-of-pocket payments. Only a small minority analyse who is most likely to experience financial hardship and what drives lack of financial protection. CONCLUSIONS: The literature provides little actionable evidence on financial protection in Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incidence of catastrophic health expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa was lower than in China in the last decade but higher than in Europe, Asia, and South America, irrespective of the definition used.

    “The incidence of catastrophic health expenditure we found in sub-Saharan Africa was lower than in China in the last decade,139 but higher than in Europe,140–142 Asia,134,143,144 and South America,145,146 irrespective of the definition used.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 39

Authors
Yerramilli, P., Fernández, Ó., & Thomson, S.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Esade (ES)
Corresponding author
Thomson, Sarah
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
493-508
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791943375
Cited by
39
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IE Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • World Health Organization
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
financial protection, catastrophic health expenditure, universal health coverage, health care financing, data availability, cross-national comparison, health system monitoring
MeSH terms
Catastrophic Illness, Europe, Health Expenditures, Financing, Personal, Humans, Insurance, Health, Poverty, Universal Health Insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review