Impact of medication non-adherence on survival after pediatric heart transplantation in the USA
Abstract
Background Medication non-adherence (NA) can result in life-threatening illness in children after solid-organ transplantation. Little is known about the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of NA in large numbers of pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients. Methods Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) data were used to identify all children <18 years of age in the U.S.A. who underwent HT from October 1999 to January 2007. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors for NA and the effect on graft survival. Results Of 2,070 pediatric heart transplants performed the median age at transplant was 6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0 to 13 years); 40% had congenital heart disease (CHD), 7% were re-transplants, 42% were non-white and 43% had Medicaid insurance. Overall, 186 (9%) children had a report of NA at a median age of 15 years with more than two-thirds of NA episodes occurring after 12 years of age. Factors independently associated with NA were: adolescent age at transplant (hazard ratio [HR] 7.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1 to 12, compared with infants); black race (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.3, compared with white); Medicaid insurance (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7, compared with non-Medicaid insurance); and ventilator or ventricular assist device (VAD) support at transplant. The risk of mortality conditional upon report of NA was 26% at 1 year and 33% at 2 years. Conclusions Medication NA is an important problem in pediatric HT recipients and is associated with high mortality. Adolescent age, black race, Medicaid insurance and invasive hemodynamic support at transplant were associated with NA, whereas time on the wait list and gender were not. Targeted interventions among at-risk populations may be warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-adherence to therapy is associated with impaired outcome in solid organ allograft recipients.
“Non-adherence to therapy is associated with impaired outcome in solid organ allograft recipients.”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Few publications have identified an association of non-adherence in the patient's record to impaired graft survival.
“Few publications have identified an association of non-adherence in the patient’s record to impaired graft survival[3,5].”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Meta-Analysis of Medical Regimen Adherence Outcomes in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation
Dew, M. A., Dabbs, A. D., Myaskovsky, L., Shyu, S., Shellmer, D. A., DiMartini, A. F., Steel, J., Unruh, M., Switzer, G. E., Shapiro, R., et al. (2009) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181b2a0e0 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Textbook of Pediatric Psychosomatic Medicine
(2010) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9781585629305 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dew, M. A., Rosenberger, E. M., Myaskovsky, L., DiMartini, A. F., DeVito Dabbs, A. J., Posluszny, D. M., Steel, J., Switzer, G. E., Shellmer, D. A., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2015) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000901 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Medication Nonadherence After Lung Transplantation in Adult Recipients
Castleberry, A. W., Bishawi, M., Worni, M., Erhunmwunsee, L., Speicher, P. J., Osho, A. A., Snyder, L. D., & Hartwig, M. G. (2017) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.067 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation
Bertram, A., Fuge, J., Suhling, H., Tudorache, I., Haverich, A., Welte, T., & Gottlieb, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226167 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Factors that influence adherence to medication in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).
Halling, T., Akkermann, S., Löffler, F., Groh, A., Heitland, I., Haefeli, W. E., Bauersachs, J., Kahl, K. G., & Westhoff-Bleck, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.788013 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oliva, M., Singh, T. P., Gauvreau, K., VanderPluym, C. J., Bastardi, H. J., & Almond, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Almond, Christopher S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 881-888
- ISSN
- 1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027880302
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Keywords
- medication non-adherence, pediatric heart transplantation, graft survival, post-transplant mortality, risk factors, adolescent transplant recipients, racial disparities, Medicaid, ventricular assist devices, congenital heart disease, transplant waiting list
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Heart Failure, Heart-Assist Devices, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Medicaid, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Survival Rate, Proportional Hazards Models, Heart Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review