Bridging the survival gap in cystic fibrosis: An investigation of lung transplant outcomes in Canada and the United States
Open accessAbstract
Background Previous literature in cystic fibrosis (CF) has shown a 10-year survival gap between Canada and the United States (US). We hypothesized that differential access to and survival after lung transplantation may contribute to the observed gap. The objectives of this study were to compare CF transplant outcomes between Canada and the US and estimate the potential contribution of transplantation to the survival gap.Methods Data from the Canadian CF Registry and the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry supplemented with data from United Network for Organ Sharing were used. The probability of surviving after transplantation between 2005 and 2016 was calculated using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Survival by insurance status at the time of transplantation and transplant center volume in the US were compared with those in Canada using Cox proportional hazard models. Simulations were used to estimate the contribution of transplantation to the survival gap.Results Between 2005 and 2016, there were 2,653 patients in the US and 470 in Canada who underwent lung transplantation for CF. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 88.3%, 71.8%, and 60.3%, respectively, in the US compared with 90.5%, 79.9%, and 69.7%, respectively, in Canada. Patients in the US were also more likely to die on the waitlist (p < 0.01) than patients in Canada. If the proportion of who underwent transplantation and post-transplant survival in the US were to increase to those observed in Canada, we estimate that the survival gap would decrease from 10.8 years to 7.5 years.Conclusions Differences in waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival can explain up to a third of the survival gap observed between the US and Canada.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous published literature reported 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after first lung transplantation for CF of 88.3%, 71.8%, and 60.3% in the US and 90.5%, 79.9%, and 69.7% in Canada.
“Previous published literature reported the 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates were 88.3%, 71.8% and 60.3% in the US and 90.5%, 79.9% and 69.7% in Canada for individuals who underwent a first lung transplantation for CF. 4”
From Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
Survival following a second lung transplant in cystic fibrosis patients is lower than estimates following a first transplant.
“Survival following second lung transplant in CF patients is lower than estimates following first transplant.”
From Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
The Methods (page unavailable) say survival was measured from the first lung transplant and that a sensitivity analysis censored patients at repeat transplant. The Results (page unavailable) refer to that analysis but do not report survival following a second transplant or compare it with survival following a first. Searches for second and repeat transplant survival found no such comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Stephenson, A. L., Ramos, K. J., Sykes, J., Ma, X., Stanojevic, S., Quon, B. S., Marshall, B. C., Petren, K., Ostrenga, J. S., Fink, A. K., Faro, A., Elbert, A., Chaparro, C., & Goss, C. H.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Washington Medical Center (US)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stephenson, Anne L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7925420
- OpenAlex
- W3111174656
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30DK089507, R01AI101307, R01HL103965, R01HL113382, U M1HL119073)
- Food and Drug Administration (K23HL138154, R01FD003704, RAMOS17A0)
- Cystic Fibrosis Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Keywords
- cystic fibrosis, lung transplantation, survival gap, waitlist mortality, post-transplant survival, insurance status, transplant center volume, cross-national comparison, Canada, United States
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, United States, Waiting Lists, Survival Rate, Lung Transplantation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review