The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences
Open accessAbstract
The study measured listener sensitivity to increments of a target inter-onset interval (IOI) embedded within isochronous tone sequences that featured a single accented tonal component. The sequences consisted of six 1000-Hz tone bursts separated by silent intervals to establish equal tonal IOIs of 200 ms within the sequence. Tone burst durations within the sequences were 50 ms, except one tone had a longer duration of 100 ms to produce a perception of accent. Duration DLs in ms for increments of a single sequence IOI were measured adaptively by adjusting the duration of the silent interval between two tones. Sequence position of the target IOI differed across conditions. Listeners included young normal-hearing adults and older adults with and without hearing loss. Discrimination performance of the two older listener groups was equivalent and significantly poorer than that of the younger listeners in each discrimination condition. The age-related discrimination deficits were independent of sequence locations of both the target interval and the accented tonal component. Comparative DLs collected for target intervals in unaccented tone sequences with equal tone durations revealed that the detrimental effects of accent on temporal discrimination were primarily restricted to the older listeners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Older people also experience difficulty discerning distinct sounds delivered in succession (Fitzgibbons & Gordon-Salant, 2010; Fitzgibbons, Gordon-Salant, & Barrett, 2007).”
From Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults (2012) · cites this paper as Fitzgibbons & Gordon-Salant, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
Levitt, H. (1971) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912375 · Cited by 5,505 · cited 2×
“Threshold estimates derived by this adaptive rule corresponded to values associated with 70.7% correct discrimination (Levitt, 1971).”
InfluentialPfeiffer, E. A. (1975) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x · Cited by 5,320 · cited 1×
“Additionally, all listeners passed a screening test for general cognitive awareness (Pfeiffer, 1977).”
Temporal Factors and Speech Recognition Performance in Young and Elderly Listeners
Gordon-Salant, S. M., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3606.1276 · Cited by 478 · cited 1×
“This observation is most evident for listening tasks that utilize sentence-length speech samples presented at rapid presentation rates, produced either by fast talkers or time-compression techniques applied to speech waveforms (Wingfield et al., 1985; Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1993; Tun, 1998).”
Self-citationGap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults
Schneider, B. A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kowalchuk, D., & Lamb, M. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408403 · Cited by 261 · cited 2×
“Most of the experimental tasks used relatively simple stimuli and asked listeners to detect brief temporal gaps between successive sounds (e.g., Schneider et al., 1994; Snell, 1997; Schneider and Hamstra, 1999), or discriminate changes in the duration of time intervals separating pairs of stimulus…”
Age-related changes in temporal gap detection
Snell, K. B. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.418205 · Cited by 248 · cited 1×
“…tasks used relatively simple stimuli and asked listeners to detect brief temporal gaps between successive sounds (e.g., Schneider et al., 1994; Snell, 1997; Schneider and Hamstra, 1999), or discriminate changes in the duration of time intervals separating pairs of stimulus markers (Abel et…”
Wingfield, A., Poon, L. W., Lombardi, L., & Lowe, D. (1985) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/40.5.579 · Cited by 232 · cited 1×
“This observation is most evident for listening tasks that utilize sentence-length speech samples presented at rapid presentation rates, produced either by fast talkers or time-compression techniques applied to speech waveforms (Wingfield et al., 1985; Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1993; Tun, 1998).”
Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners
Schneider, B. A., & Hamstra, S. J. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.427062 · Cited by 201
Age Effects on Measures of Auditory Duration Discrimination
Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (1994) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3703.662 · Cited by 171 · cited 2×
“, 1994; Snell, 1997; Schneider and Hamstra, 1999), or discriminate changes in the duration of time intervals separating pairs of stimulus markers (Abel et al., 1990; Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant, 1994; Grose et al, 2006).”
Self-citationDurational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English*
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A. B., & Nord, L. (1991) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30327-4 · Cited by 156 · cited 5×
“Research on this topic is presently limited in scope, although at least one investigation reports that older listeners do have problems recognizing accented English sentences (Burda et al., 2003).”
InfluentialAbel, S. M., Krever, E. M., & Alberti, P. W. R. M. (1990) · Scandinavian Audiology · doi:10.3109/01050399009070751 · Cited by 136 · cited 2×
“, 1994; Snell, 1997; Schneider and Hamstra, 1999), or discriminate changes in the duration of time intervals separating pairs of stimulus markers (Abel et al., 1990; Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant, 1994; Grose et al, 2006).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Age-related hearing loss or presbycusis
Huang, Q., & Tang, J. (2010) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1270-7 · Cited by 343
Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults
Farage, M. A., Miller, K. W., Ajayi, F., & Hutchins, D. (2012) · Global Journal of Health Science · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2 · Cited by 233
“Older people also experience difficulty discerning distinct sounds delivered in succession (Fitzgibbons & Gordon-Salant, 2010; Fitzgibbons, Gordon-Salant, & Barrett, 2007).”
BackgroundAge-related changes in the central auditory system
Ouda, L., Profant, O., & Syka, J. (2015) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-014-2107-2 · Cited by 153
“Several recent reviews of this topic are available, by Schneider et al. (2010), Humes and Dubno (2010), Fitzgibbons and Gordon-Salant (2010), Humes et al. (2012) and others.”
BackgroundFrisina, R. D., Ding, B., Zhu, X., & Walton, J. P. (2016) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.101045 · Cited by 100
“In addition, prevailing evidence indicates that auditory spectral and temporal processing deficits start to manifest themselves in middle age humans [62-64], and in animal models starting in middle age [65, 66].”
BackgroundAge-related GABAA receptor changes in rat auditory cortex
Caspary, D. M., Hughes, L. F., & Ling, L. L. (2012) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.009 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S.
- Affiliations
- Gallaudet University (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fitzgibbons, Peter J.
- Venue
- Hearing Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-47
- ISSN
- 0378-5955 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2868081
- OpenAlex
- W2012739083
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R37-AG09191, R37AG009191, R01AG009191)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Keywords
- inter-onset interval, accent, tone sequences, aging, older adults, age-related hearing loss, temporal resolution, auditory perception
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Auditory Threshold, Cues, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Pitch Discrimination, Speech Perception, Time Perception, Signal Detection, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
