CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How suspended solids concentration affects nitrification rate in microalgal-bacterial photobioreactors without external aeration

Foladori, Paola, Petrini, Serena, Andreottola, Gianni·2020·Heliyon
DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03088PMC PMC6939075
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03088

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased TDS concentrations might offer more nutrients for bacterial proliferation, potentially leading to an augmented bacterial population.

    “Increased TDS concentrations might offer more nutrients for bacterial proliferation69, potentially leading to an augmented bacterial population as depicted in Fig. 2F.”

    From Impact of untreated tannery wastewater in the evolution of multidrug-resistant bacteria in Bangladesh (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Analytical methods section says the study measured total suspended solids (TSS), not total dissolved solids (TDS). The Results and discussion section links nitrifying biomass to the influent nitrogen load, but does not address whether increased TDS supplies nutrients that promote bacterial proliferation. I searched for TDS and for nutrient availability as a driver of bacterial growth. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Amand, 2013, Aeration control – a review, Water Sci. Technol, 67, 2374, 10.2166/wst.2013.139 · DOI
  2. Anbalagan, 2017, Influence of iron precipitated condition and light intensity on microalgae activated sludge based wastewater remediation, Chemosphere, 168, 1523, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.161 · DOI
  3. Arcila, 2016, Microalgae–bacteria aggregates: effect of the hydraulic retention time on the municipal wastewater treatment, biomass settleability and methane potential, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 91, 2862, 10.1002/jctb.4901 · DOI
  4. Béchet, 2013, Modeling the effects of light and temperature on algae growth: state of the art and critical assessment for productivity prediction during outdoor cultivation, Biotechnol. Adv., 31, 1648, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bilad, 2014, Membrane technology in microalgae cultivation and harvesting:A review, Biotechnol. Adv., 32, 1283, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.008 · DOI
  6. Decostere, 2016, Validation of a microalgal growth model accounting with inorganic carbon and nutrient kinetics for wastewater treatment, Chem. Eng. J., 285, 189, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.111 · DOI
  7. Dutta, 2015, Sequencing batch reactor for wastewater treatment: recent advances, Current Pollution Reports, 1, 177, 10.1007/s40726-015-0016-y · DOI
  8. Foladori, 2018, Evolution of real municipal wastewater treatment in photobioreactors and microalgae-bacteria consortia using real-time parameters, Chem. Eng. J., 345, 507, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.178 · DOI
  9. Foladori, 2018, Enhanced nitrogen removal and energy saving in a microalgal-bacterial consortium treating real municipal wastewater, Water Sci. Technol., 78, 174, 10.2166/wst.2018.094 · DOI
  10. García, 2017, Enhanced carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal from domestic wastewater in a novel anoxic-aerobic photobioreactor coupled with biogas upgrading, Chem. Eng. J., 313, 424, 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.054 · DOI
  11. Gonçalves, 2017, A review on the use of microalgal consortia for wastewater treatment, Algal Research, 24, 403, 10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.008 · DOI
  12. González-Fernández, 2011, Nitrogen transformations under different conditions in open ponds by means of microalgae–bacteria consortium treating pig slurry, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 960, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.052 · DOI
  13. Jaramillo, 2018, Advanced strategies to improve nitrification process in sequencing batch reactors – a review, J. Environ. Manag., 218, 154
  14. Judd, 2015, Algal remediation of CO2 and nutrient discharges: a review, Water Res., 87, 356, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.021 · DOI
  15. Karya, 2013, Photo-oxygenation to support nitrification in an algal–bacterial consortium treating artificial wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 134, 244, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.005 · DOI
  16. Krustok, 2015, Characterization of algal and microbial community growth in a wastewater treating batch photo-bioreactor inoculated with lake water, Algal Research, 11, 421, 10.1016/j.algal.2015.02.005 · DOI
  17. Krustok, 2016, Inhibition of nitrification in municipal wastewater-treating photobioreactors: effect on algal growth and nutrient uptake, Bioresour. Technol., 202, 238, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.020 · DOI
  18. Lee, 2015, Effects of photoperiod on nutrient removal, biomass production, and algal-bacterial population dynamics in lab-scale photobioreactors treating municipal wastewater, Water Res., 68, 680, 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.029 · DOI
  19. Leong, 2018, Co-cultivation of activated sludge and microalgae for the simultaneous enhancements of nitrogen-rich wastewater bioremediation and lipid production, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, 87, 216, 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.03.038 · DOI
  20. Liu, 2017, Advanced nutrient removal from surface water by a consortium of attachedmicroalgae and bacteria: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 241, 1127, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.054 · DOI
  21. Luo, 2017, Simultaneous microalgae cultivation and wastewater treatment in submerged membrane photobioreactors: a review, Algal Research, 24, 425, 10.1016/j.algal.2016.10.026 · DOI
  22. Luo, 2019, A novel index of total oxygen demand for the comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption for urban wastewater treatment, Appl. Energy, 236, 253, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.101 · DOI
  23. Muñoz, 2006, Algal–bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review, Water Res., 40, 2799, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.011 · DOI
  24. Rada-Ariza, 2017, Nitrification by microalgal-bacterial consortia for ammonium removal in flat panel sequencing batch photo-bioreactors, Bioresour. Technol., 245, 81, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.019 · DOI
  25. Riaño, 2012, Microalgal-based systems for wastewater treatment: effect of applied organic and nutrient loading rate on biomass composition, Ecol. Eng., 49, 112, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.021 · DOI
  26. Subashchandrabose, 2011, Consortia of cyanobacteria/microalgae and bacteria: biotechnological potential, Biotechnol. Adv., 29, 896, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.009 · DOI
  27. Sun, 2019, Performance and microbial community analysis of an algal-activated sludge symbiotic system: effect of activated sludge concentration, J. Environ. Sci., 76, 121, 10.1016/j.jes.2018.04.010 · DOI
  28. Tiron, 2015, Granular activated algae for wastewater treatment, Water Sci. Technol., 71, 832, 10.2166/wst.2015.010 · DOI
  29. Udaiyappan, 2017, A review of the potentials, challenges and current status of microalgae biomass applications in industrial wastewater treatment, J Water Process Eng, 20, 8, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.09.006 · DOI
  30. Vargas, 2016, Assessment of microalgae and nitrifiers activity in a consortium in a continuous operation and the effect of oxygen depletion, Electron. J. Biotechnol., 23, 63, 10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.08.002 · DOI
  31. Vergara, 2016, Influence of light intensity on bacterial nitrifying activity in algal bacterial photobioreactors and its implications for microalgae-based wastewater treatment, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 114, 116, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.06.006 · DOI
  32. Vu, 2016, Symbiotic hollow fiber membrane photobioreactor for microalgal growth and bacterial wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 219, 261, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.105 · DOI
  33. Wagner, 2016, Towards a consensus-based biokinetic model for green microalgae - the ASM-A, Water Res., 103, 485, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.026 · DOI
  34. Wang, 2016, Perspectives on the feasibility of using microalgae for industrial wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 222, 485, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.106 · DOI
  35. Wang, 2018, Advances in algal-prokaryotic wastewater treatment: a review of nitrogen transformations, reactor configurations and molecular tools, J. Environ. Manag., 217, 845
  36. Ye, 2018, The mechanism of enhanced wastewater nitrogen removal by photo- sequencing batch reactors based on comprehensive analysis of system dynamics within a cycle, Bioresour. Technol., 260, 256, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.132 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Foladori, P., Petrini, S., & Andreottola, G.
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e03088
ISSN
2405-8440
DOI
10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03088
PMC
PMC6939075
Cited by
35
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review