The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Access to quality education is still a major bottleneck in developing countries. Efforts at opening the access to a large majority of citizens in developing nations have explored different strategies including the use of multimedia technology. This paper provides a systematic review of different multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes with a view to examining how multimedia technologies have proven to be a veritable strategy for bridging the gap in the provision of unrestricted access to quality education and improved learners' performance. The review process includes conducting an extensive search of relevant scientific literature, selection of relevant studies using a pre-determined inclusion criteria, literature analysis, and synthesis of the findings of the various studies that have investigated how multimedia have been used for learning and teaching processes. The review examines various case study reports of multimedia tools, their success and limiting factors, application areas, evaluation methodologies, technology components, and age groups targeted by the tools. Future research directions are also provided. Apart from text and images, existing tools were found to have multimedia components such as audio, video, animation and 3-D. The study concluded that the majority of the multimedia solutions deployed for teaching and learning target the solution to the pedagogical content of the subject of interest and the user audience of the solution while the success of the different multimedia tools that have been used on the various target groups and subjects can be attributed to the technologies and components embedded in their development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Determining sample size for research activities
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000308 · Cited by 18,930
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research
KELLEY, K. (2003) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg031 · Cited by 2,157
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.005 · Cited by 1,976
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2005) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.004 · Cited by 1,602
High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004813 · Cited by 1,232
Cited by
Promising Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Recent Developments and Future Challenges
Almufarreh, A., & Arshad, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15086917 · Cited by 109
Multimedia Security Using Encryption: A Survey
Hosny, K. M., Zaki, M. A., Lashin, N. A., Fouda, M. M., & Hamza, H. M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3287858 · Cited by 82
Liu, Y., Wu, Y. C., Fu, H., Guo, W. Y., & Wang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242928 · Cited by 21
Mosharrafa, R. A., Akther, T., & Siddique, F. K. (2024) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1788 · Cited by 20
A Generative AI-based Teaching Material System Using a Human-In-The-Loop Model
Chen, S., Liu, Q., & He, B. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir59294.2023.10391244 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L.
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e05312
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095703149
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
- The paper
- Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
