Cited by 27Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Can artificial intelligence simplify the screening of muscle mass loss?

Open access
Buccheri, Enrico, Dell’Aquila, Daniele, Russo, Marco, Chiaramonte, Rita, Musumeci, Giuseppe, Vecchio, Michele·2023·Heliyon

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a risk factor for morbidity and preventable mortality in old age, with consequent high costs for the national health system. Its diagnosis requires costly radiological examinations, such as the DEXA, which complicate screening in medical centers with a high prevalence of sarcopenia. Objectives: Developing a nearly zero-cost screening tool to emulate the performance of DEXA in identifying patients with muscle mass loss. This can crucially help the early diagnosis of sarcopenia at large-scale, contributing to reduce its prevalence and related complications with timely treatments. Methods: We exploit cross-sectional data for about 14,500 patients and 38 non-laboratory variables from successive NHANES over 7 years (1999-2006). Data are analyzed through a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence approach based on decision trees. Results: A reduced number of anthropometric parameters allows to predict the outcome of DEXA with AUC between 0.92 and 0.94. The most complex model derived in this paper exploits 6 variables, related to the circumference of key corporal segments and to the evaluation of body fat. It achieves an optimal trade-off sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.82. Restricting exclusively to variables related to lower limb, we obtain an even simpler tool with only slightly lower accuracy (AUC 0.88-0.90). Conclusions: Anthropometric data seem to contain the entire informative content of a more complex set of non-laboratory variables, including anamnestic and/or morbidity factors. Compared to previously published screening tools for muscle mass loss, the newly developed models are less complex and achieve a better accuracy. The new results might suggest a possible inversion of the standard diagnostic algorithm of sarcopenia. We conjecture a new diagnostic scheme, which requires a dedicated clinical validation that goes beyond the scope of the present study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16323

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NHANES data has supported the creation of innovative AI-driven screening tools for sarcopenia and muscle mass assessment, demonstrating that anthropometric measurements can effectively substitute costly radiological examinations whilst maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

    “Furthermore, NHANES data has supported the creation of innovative AI-driven screening tools for sarcopenia and muscle mass assessment, demonstrating how anthropometric measurements can effectively substitute costly radiological examinations whilst maintaining high diagnostic accuracy (66,67).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Sayer A.A. Sarcopenia Lancet 393 2019 2636 2646 31171417
  2. [2]Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Baeyens J.P. Bauer J.M. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis Age Ageing 39 2010 412 423 20392703 PMC2886201
  3. [3]Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Bahat G. Bauer J. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis Age Ageing 48 2019 16 31 30312372 PMC6322506
  4. [5]Gielen E. O'Neill T.W. Pye S.R. Endocrine determinants of incident sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly European men J. Cach. Sarcop. Muscle 6 2015 242 252 PMC4575556 26401471
  5. [6]Yu R. Wong M. Leung J. Lee J. Auyeung T.W. Woo J. Incidence, reversibility, risk factors and the protective effect of high body mass index against sarcopenia in community-dwelling older Chinese adults Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 14 suppl 1 2014 15 28 24450557
  6. [7]Dodds R.M. Granic A. Davies K. Kirkwood T.B.L. Jagger C. Sayer A.A. Prevalence and incidence of sarcopenia in the very old: findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study J. Cach. Sarcop. Muscle 8 2017 229 237 PMC5377385 27897431
  7. [8]Beaudart C. Zaaria M. Pasleau F. Reginster J.-Y. Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS One 12 2017 e0169548 PMC5240970 28095426
  8. [9]Norman K. Otten L. Financial impact of sarcopenia or low muscle mass—a short review Clin. Nutr. 38 4 2019 1489 1495 30316536
  9. [10]Churilov I. Churilov L. MacIsaac R.J. Ekinci E.I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of sarcopenia in post acute inpatient rehabilitation Osteoporos. Int. 29 2018 805 812 29455250
  10. [13]Goodman M.J. Ghate S.R. Mavros P. Development of a practical screening tool to predict low muscle mass using NHANES 1999–2004 J. Cach. Sarcop. Muscle 4 2013 187 197 PMC3774922 23673689
  11. [14]Katano S. Yano T. Ohori K. Novel prediction equation for appendicular skeletal muscle mass estimation in patients with heart failure: potential application in daily clinical practice Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 0 00 2020 1 4 34402875
  12. [15]Chien K.Y. Chen C.N. Chen S.C. Wang H.H. Zhou W.S. Chen L.H. A community-based approach to lean body mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction using body circumferences in community-dwelling elderly in Taiwan Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 29 1 2020 94 100 32229447
  13. [19]Chen T. Guestrin C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. KDD '16 Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2016 785 794
  14. [20]Bishop C.M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 2006 Springer Cambridge
  15. [24]Perkins N.J. Schisterman E.F. The inconsistency of ‘‘optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve Am. J. Epidemiol. 163 2006 670 675 16410346 PMC1444894
  16. [25]Santos L.P. Gonzalez M.C. Orlandi S.P. New prediction equations to estimate appendicular skeletal muscle mass using calf circumference: results from NHANES 1999–2006 JPEN - J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 00 2019 0 1 10 31081126
  17. [26]Ishii S. Tanaka T. Shibasaki K. Development of a simple screening test for sarcopenia in older adults Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 14 Suppl. 1 2014 93 101 24450566
  18. [27]Chen B.B. Shih T.T.F. Hsu C.Y. Thigh muscle volume predicted by anthropometric measurements and correlated with physical function in the older adults J. Nutr. Health Aging 15 6 2011 433 438 21623463
  19. [28]Abe T. Patterson K.M. Stover C.D. Site-specific thigh muscle loss as an independent phenomenon for age-related muscle loss in middle-aged and older men and women Age 36 3 2014 9634 24569919 PMC4082600
  20. [29]Visser M. Kritchevsky S.B. Goodpaster B.H. Leg muscle mass and composition in relation to lower extremity performance in men and women aged 70 to 79: the health, aging and body composition study J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 50 5 2002 897 904 12028178
  21. [30]Van Den Noort J.C. Van Der Leeden M. Stapper G. Muscle weakness is associated with non-contractile muscle tissue of the vastus medialis muscle in knee osteoarthritis 27 BMC Muscoskel. Disord. 23 1 2022 91 PMC8796405 35086518
  22. [32]Vlietstra L. Hendrickx W. Waters D.L. Exercise interventions in healthy older adults with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Australas. J. Ageing 37 2018 169 183 29638028

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buccheri, E., Dell’Aquila, D., Russo, M., Chiaramonte, R., Musumeci, G., & Vecchio, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Buccheri, Enrico
  • Dell’Aquila, Daniele
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e16323
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376956636
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
sarcopenia, muscle mass loss, sarcopenia screening, low-cost screening tool, anthropometric parameters, fat mass, limb circumference, decision tree, NHANES, sarcopenia diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review