Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok
Open accessAbstract
Social media usage can impact its users’ mental and physical health. In particular, social media challenges, activities performed by an individual or a group that are uploaded to a social networking site to achieve a specific goal, have the potential to encourage and spread positive and negative behavior. We conducted interviews with thirty-two college students (ages 18-23) and using qualitative analysis grounded in the Uses and Gratifications Theory determined the motivations underlying participation in these challenges on the rapidly growing and unique social media platform TikTok. Six categories consistent with the Uses and Gratifications Theory emerged from this analysis, indicating that individuals use TikTok for 1) entertainment, 2) convenience and utility for widespread communication, 3) increasing social interaction, 4) finding social support, 5) seeking and sharing information, and 6) escaping from everyday life. We discuss how these motivations can be used to minimize the spread of viral self-harm challenges through TikTok.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Falgoust et al. (2022) found six categories of motivators underlined individual use of TikTok among college students aged 18-23: entertainment, convenience and utility for widespread communication, increasing social interaction, finding social support, seeking and sharing information, and escaping from everyday life.
“Their conclusion was that six categories of motivators, consistent with UGT, underlined individual use of TikTok: entertainment, convenience and utility for widespread communication, increasing social interaction, finding social support, seeking and sharing information, and escaping from everyday life.”
From Applying Uses and Gratifications Theory to TikTok: A systematic literature review of users' motivations (2025) · cites this paper as Falgoust et al. (2022)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Chalil Madathil, K.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zinzow, Heidi
- Venue
- Human Factors in Healthcare
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100014
- ISSN
- 2772-5014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4282979415
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 48.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Factors in Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- uses and gratifications theory, social media challenges, TikTok, young adults, university students, user motivation, social support, social interaction, escapism, entertainment, information seeking, mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review