Cited by 190Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media in Health EducationMedia and Digital Communication

Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok

Open access
Falgoust, Grace, Winterlind, Emma, Moon, Prachi, Parker, Alden, Zinzow, Heidi, Chalil Madathil, Kapil·2022·Human Factors in Healthcare

Abstract

Social media usage can impact its users’ mental and physical health. In particular, social media challenges, activities performed by an individual or a group that are uploaded to a social networking site to achieve a specific goal, have the potential to encourage and spread positive and negative behavior. We conducted interviews with thirty-two college students (ages 18-23) and using qualitative analysis grounded in the Uses and Gratifications Theory determined the motivations underlying participation in these challenges on the rapidly growing and unique social media platform TikTok. Six categories consistent with the Uses and Gratifications Theory emerged from this analysis, indicating that individuals use TikTok for 1) entertainment, 2) convenience and utility for widespread communication, 3) increasing social interaction, 4) finding social support, 5) seeking and sharing information, and 6) escaping from everyday life. We discuss how these motivations can be used to minimize the spread of viral self-harm challenges through TikTok.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Falgoust et al. (2022) found six categories of motivators underlined individual use of TikTok among college students aged 18-23: entertainment, convenience and utility for widespread communication, increasing social interaction, finding social support, seeking and sharing information, and escaping from everyday life.

    “Their conclusion was that six categories of motivators, consistent with UGT, underlined individual use of TikTok: entertainment, convenience and utility for widespread communication, increasing social interaction, finding social support, seeking and sharing information, and escaping from everyday life.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 190

Authors
Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Chalil Madathil, K.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Zinzow, Heidi
Venue
Human Factors in Healthcare
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
2
Pages
100014
ISSN
2772-5014 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282979415
Cited by
190
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 6
FWCI
48.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Factors in Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
uses and gratifications theory, social media challenges, TikTok, young adults, university students, user motivation, social support, social interaction, escapism, entertainment, information seeking, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review