Cited by 33Liver Disease and TransplantationHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Systematic review of MARS treatment in post-hepatectomy liver failure

Open access
Sparrelid, Ernesto, Gilg, Stefan, van Gulik, Thomas M.·2020·HPB

Abstract

Background Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a serious complication after major liver resection with severe 90-day mortality. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a potential treatment option in PHLF. This systematic review sought to analyze the experiences and results of MARS in PHLF. Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review using PubMed and Embase was performed. Non-randomized trials were assessed by the MINORS criteria. Results 2884 records were screened and 22 studies were extracted (no RCT). They contained 809 patients including 82 patients with PHLF. Five studies (n = 34) specifically investigated the role of MARS in patients with PHLF. In these patients, overall 90-day survival was 47%. Patients with primary PHLF had significantly better 90-day survival compared to patients with secondary PHLF (60% vs 14%, p = 0.03) and treatment was started earlier (median POD 6 (range 2-21) vs median POD 30 (range 15-39); p < 0.001). Number of treatments differed non-significantly in these groups. Safety and feasibility of early MARS treatment following hepatectomy was demonstrated in one prospective study. No major adverse events have been reported. Conclusion Early MARS treatment is safe and feasible in patients with PHLF. Currently, MARS cannot be recommended as standard of care in these patients. Further prospective studies are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.03.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aside from salvage liver transplantation, no causal effective therapy exists for advanced liver dysfunction.

    “Compared to treatment options in other types of end-stage organ failure such as dialysis in kidney disease, to date, aside from salvage liver transplantation, no causal effective therapy exists for advanced liver dysfunction [8].”

    From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion says there are no accepted treatment options for post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) beyond supportive and liver-protective care, and identifies transplantation as a possible alternative. The Introduction likewise says no specific treatment is available for PHLF. The cited paper does not establish this broader claim for all advanced liver dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Qadan M, Garden OJ, Corvera CU, Visser BC. (2016) Management of postoperative hepatic failure. J Am Coll Surg 222:195-208. HPB 2020, 22, 950-960 © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  2. Sen S, Mookerjee RP, Davies NA, Williams R, Jalan R. (2002) Review article: the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS) in liver failure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16(Suppl 5):32-38.
  3. Tsipotis E, Shuja A, Jaber BL. (2015) Albumin dialysis for liver failure: a systematic review. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 22:382-390.
  4. Baker MA, Maley WR, Needleman L, Doria C. (2015) Ex vivo resection of hepatic neoplasia and autotransplantation: a case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1169-1176.
  5. Kellersmann R, Gassel HJ, Buhler C, Thiede A, Timmermann W. (2002) Application of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System in patients with severe liver failure after hepatic resection or transplantation: initial single-centre experiences. Liver 22(Suppl 2):56-58. HPB 2020, 22, 950-960 © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  6. Stutchfield BM, Simpson K, Wigmore SJ. (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following extracorporeal liver support. Br J Surg 98:623-631.
  7. He GL, Feng L, Duan CY, Hu X, Zhou CJ, Cheng Y et al. (2015) Meta- analysis of survival with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system for liver failure. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:17046-17054. HPB 2020, 22, 950-960 © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sparrelid, E., Gilg, S., & van Gulik, T. M.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Sparrelid, Ernesto
Venue
HPB
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
950-960
ISSN
1365-182X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014375113
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HPB (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
post-hepatectomy liver failure, molecular adsorbent recirculating system, Mars, liver resection complications, 90-day survival, early treatment initiation, treatment safety and feasibility
MeSH terms
Hepatectomy, Humans, Prospective Studies, Liver Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review