Circadian variation of late potentials in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation associated with J waves: Insights into alternative pathophysiology and risk stratification
Abstract
Background The presence of J waves on ECGs is related to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF). Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the pathophysiology of J waves by assessing risk markers that reflect electrophysiologic abnormalities. Methods The study enrolled 22 idiopathic VF patients (17 men and 5 women; mean age 36 +/- 13 years). Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of J waves. The following risk stratifiers were assessed: late potentials (LPs; depolarization abnormality marker) for 24 hours using a newly developed signal-averaging system, and T-wave alternans and QT dispersion (repolarization abnormality markers). Frequency-domain heart rate variability (HRV), which reflects autonomic modulation, also was assessed. The results were compared to those of 30 control subjects with J waves and 30 with no J wave, matched for age and gender to the idiopathic VF patients. Results J waves were present in 7 (32%) idiopathic VF patients. The incidence of LP in the idiopathic VF J-wave group was higher than in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group (86% vs 27%, P = .02). In contrast, repolarization abnormality markers did not differ between the two groups. In the idiopathic VF J-wave group, dynamic changes in LP parameters (fQRS, RMS(40), LAS(40)) were observed and were pronounced at nighttime; this was not the case in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group and the control J-wave group. High-frequency components (vagal tone index)…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early repolarization pattern is associated with increased risk of cardiac death in population-based studies.
“Furthermore, it has been shown in population-based studies to be associated with increased risk of cardiac death (352,353,355–357).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [355]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Abe, A., Ikeda, T., Tsukada, T., Ishiguro, H., Miwa, Y., Miyakoshi, M., Mera, H., Yusu, S., & Yoshino, H.
- Affiliations
- Kyorin University (JP)
- Venue
- Heart Rhythm
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 675-682
- ISSN
- 1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017951176
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Kyorin University
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, J wave, late potentials, circadian variation, repolarization abnormalities, T-wave alternans, QT dispersion, heart rate variability, vagal tone, risk stratification, signal-averaged electrocardiogram
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Heart Conduction System, Heart Rate, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Ventricular Fibrillation, Biomarkers, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Body Surface Potential Mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review